The new announcement that a new restaurant is going to be constructed in my neighbourhood rises people's attention. Due to possible noise at all day round made by this restaurant and its customers, in many inhabitants' opinion, it is not an advisable proposal. Contrary to their viewpoints is my perspective that the new restaurant can benefit people considerably, due to its contributions to providing convenience of having meals and making frequent social interaction more possible.
Among all the benefits of building a new restaurant in our neighbourhood is the convenience provided for people who are too busy to cook for themselves. Citizens nowadays are leading a hustling and bustling lifestyle, and therefore restaurants with high walkability gain growing popularity among these citizens. Undoubtedly, the newly built restaurant in our neighbourhood can not only deprive people living in the surroundings of the hassle of preparing meals, but also help them save a huge amount of time. For example, even though my parents are extremely busy, they have to cook every day for three meals on account of the lack of restaurants surrounded our neighbourhood. I always hear from their complaints about that cooking is quite time-consuming as well as their hope for an accessible restaurant. Hence, I believe that the newly established restaurant is beneficial for my parents, since it can save quantities of their time and distract them from routine cooking.
Another primary benefit of the newly built restaurant revolves around the fact that it makes it easier for people living in the surroundings to have more social interaction with each other. The restaurant can function as a platform, where residents can encounter and converse with diverse people. With constant and continuous interaction in the canteen, there is no doubt that some of them can form and keep a steady relationship and become good friends eventually. Take my friend's grandpa, always consuming his breakfast in a local canteen, as an example. The grandpa got acquainted with several consumers here and formed a firm friendship with them. Therefore, I believe the restaurant in our neighbourhood could serve as the same way as the canteen the grandpa often goes to.
In a sum, I support the proposal.
- Most advertisements make products seem much better than they really are. 71
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? All university students should take basic science courses regardless of their fields of study. 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement: All university students should take basic science courses regardless of their field of study. 73
- It has recently been announced that a new restaurant may be built in your neighborhood. Do you support or oppose this plan? Why? Use specific reasons and details to support your answer. 78
- It has recently been announced that a new restaurant may be built in your neighborhood. Do you support or oppose this plan? Why? Use specific reasons and details to support your answer. 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 206, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'inhabitants'' or 'inhabitant's'?
Suggestion: inhabitants'; inhabitant's
...s restaurant and its customers, in many inhabitants opinion, it is not an advisable proposa...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, therefore, well, for example, no doubt, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 38.0 43.0788530466 88% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1919.0 1977.66487455 97% => OK
No of words: 365.0 407.700716846 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25753424658 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37092360658 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10438403313 2.67179642975 116% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 212.727598566 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558904109589 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 585.0 618.680645161 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.6357863962 48.9658058833 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.9375 100.406767564 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8125 20.6045352989 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.75 5.45110844103 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0931842330387 0.236089414692 39% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.038358656616 0.076458572812 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0417061024708 0.0737576698707 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0800061322501 0.150856017488 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0398196418606 0.0645574589148 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 11.7677419355 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 10.9000537634 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 86.8835125448 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.