Interest is the best teacher, and students tend to perform well if they are interested in their subjects. Some people argue that the best way to inspire interest among students is to explain the usage of such knowledge and how the understanding of it will help students in real life. Nevertheless, from my perspective, illustrating how subjects can help students live better outside of the campus is not the best way to interest students.
On the one hand, many subjects appear to be useless in real life. For instance, mastering in history may not be a determining factor for students major in Finance. What's more, Math seems of little importance for art students. Admittedly, these subjects will extend the knowledge range for students and may improve the skill of thinking in the long run. However, with limited time and energy, students are more likely to devote themselves to subjects that are most efficient to them. For example, a finance student tends to study harder in Bank Management instead of history, no matter how the teachers explain the benefits of learning it.
On the other hand, the difficulty of some subjects can hinder the students from being interested regardless of how useful those subjects can be. For instance, programs like Physical and high-level math can be abnormally complicated and hard to master. It will be hard for students to show any interest in the equations of these subjects unless the students initially have passions for them. Students may study hard not because they like these subjects, but because they need to pass them to graduate.
Besides, there are many other ways to attract students other than informing them about the usage of these subjects. For example, teachers can deliver lectures more humorously by making jokes. Also, incentive program such as scholarship could encourage students to study harder. Meanwhile, increase the chances for students to participate and get involved in classes could also be an effective way to draw attention for students.
In summary, helping students to become more interested in a subject by informing the usefulness in real life to students is not the best way to make students more interested in study material as some subjects seem to be useless in real life, and some topics are too hard to be interesting for students. Besides, many other ways are no worse than telling the usage of knowledge to students.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Some people prefer to buy technological devices as soon as they are available to the public. Others people prefer to wait until many people have used them. Which do you prefer? 73
- Do you agree or disagree? Rather than help children with their schoolwork, parents should encourage their children do their work independently 83
- As a student of university that has a long break between university semesters, the university requires all students to do one of the following for one month during the break: 1、Students must take a course on the subject that has no direct connection to 73
- Parents give their children weekly money to buy whatever they want.Some people think this can cause bad habits and ideas about money in children. Others think the opposite. What's your opinion? 70
- As a student of university that has a long break between university semesters, the university requires all students to do one of the following for one month during the break: 1、Students must take a course on the subject that has no direct connection to 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 165, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: What's
...g factor for students major in Finance. Whats more, Math seems of little importance f...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, well, while, for example, for instance, in summary, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 11.0286738351 18% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 43.0788530466 46% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 52.1666666667 117% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2015.0 1977.66487455 102% => OK
No of words: 399.0 407.700716846 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05012531328 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46933824581 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6594324963 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 212.727598566 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.473684210526 0.524837075471 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 627.3 618.680645161 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.59856630824 21% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.3968449707 48.9658058833 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.052631579 100.406767564 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.6045352989 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.05263157895 5.45110844103 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.492566112468 0.236089414692 209% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.159508698798 0.076458572812 209% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.114293682613 0.0737576698707 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.309986867365 0.150856017488 205% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.110609321936 0.0645574589148 171% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 86.8835125448 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.