It is a waste of money for the government to spend money on space travel or space exploration.
As we all know, every dollar of the government budget is from people and should for people. Government officials ought to have a broader perspective when it comes to funding, and avoid unilateral thinking. Is it a waste of money to spend money on space? I think the answers to this question cannot be made without considering the government’s own situation.
First of all, putting a huge amount of money in space exploration or travel for some poor and under-developing countries are wasting their precious government’s budget. There are many more crucial problems in these countries to solve first and the government should give priority to them. There probably is not enough food to eat, clothes to wear and house to live in for citizens, like in Iraq, Syria and North Korean. Less money will be used to aid them if it be-is spent on space research. In addition, other harsh problems like environmental protection should also be given enough attention and financial aid. Thus, governments should at first solve its problems on the earth and then consider to (the) space.
Secondly, space exploration is a very advanced and new field for some big and rich countries to learn. Since there are only a few achievements in the world about the space, more information is likely to be discovered in the near future. The USA gives NASA a big quality of government budget every year for space discovery and has found the most of the latest celestial information. Owing to its strong and highly developed space technology, American government makes lots of money by helping other countries launch satellites and building spacecraft. The American government can gain the latest discovery and make up some complementary for a budget at the same time by investing in space exploration. For countries like America, taking money to research space is definitely not a waste.
In conclusion, governments should think considerably before making a budget. They cannot simply learn from others experience without considering its real situation. For most developing countries, the major task is development while for developed countries, space exploration will bring a lot of benefits.
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030 73
- Some people believe that smartphones are destroying social interaction today To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- The most important thing the government should do to improve health care is to clean the environment. 76
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- in some countries owning a home rather than renting one is very important for people Why might this be the case Do you think this is a positive or negative situation 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, second, secondly, so, then, thus, while, i think, in addition, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 11.0286738351 9% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 43.0788530466 32% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 8.0752688172 272% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1832.0 1977.66487455 93% => OK
No of words: 354.0 407.700716846 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17514124294 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33761313653 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97991938873 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.562146892655 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 570.6 618.680645161 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.59856630824 21% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.5108121798 48.9658058833 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.4210526316 100.406767564 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6315789474 20.6045352989 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.63157894737 5.45110844103 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.450019838288 0.236089414692 191% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.148071591534 0.076458572812 194% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.160733046978 0.0737576698707 218% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.270099065489 0.150856017488 179% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0956455911095 0.0645574589148 148% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 10.9000537634 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 86.8835125448 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.