Forming the concept of money in children's minds is an essential process in education. Some people hold that by providing a certain amount of money to kids without asking where it goes, children could learn about how to manage their property well. Nevertheless, from my perspective, letting children have the freedom to buy whatever they want well do more harm than good as bad habits and ideas about money could come into beings when parents are conducting such method to educate their springs.
On the one hand, without construction and guidance, children may misuse the money that their life could be ruined. Many goods and services are not for children and could cause psychological hurt. For instance, drugs could cause server addiction, and it is difficult for drug users to get clean. Not only could drug damage one's mental and physical health, but also could drug dry up one's fund as it costs a fortune to satisfy one's needs. Meanwhile, drugs are also associated with other crimes such as illegal trade and stealing. If children choose to use their money for drugs, even a small amount, in the beginning, their lives could be destroyed. Other goods such as pron movies, guns could be harmful as well. As a result, parents should set limitations on the use of money instead of encouraging them to buy whatever they want.
On the other hand, if ample money is provided, children are likely to over-spending, which could lead to bad habits and financial difficulty in the future. Kids at the beginning may not understand the notion of money. All they could get is that a certain amount of money will be given to them without costs and that money could exchange for things they like. Gradually, children will tend to take it for granted that money will come automatically to them. Money comes so easily as all they need to do is ask and wait. They do not need to work hard to get what they want. Instead, they wait. Without the trouble of earning money, it is unlikely that kids will cherish them. For example, a kid could buy an expensive Loge toy without hesitation if payment is provided freely for his or her. As a result, kids will tend to grow a habit of over-spending.
In summary, money should not be provided to children as a purpose of education because negative habits and conception of money could form without the guidance of parents. After all, children are with relatively little knowledge and understanding of this world, and the help from their parents is crucial for them.
- In order to be successful, people have two choices1)To take risks2)To keep cautious and carefulWhich one do you think is the better way to succeed? Give reason to explain your choice. 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Your job has more effect on your happiness than your social life does 57
- As a student of university that has a long break between university semesters, the university requires all students to do one of the following for one month during the break: 1、Students must take a course on the subject that has no direct connection to 73
- Do you agree that it is better to work for business owned by someone else than to work for the business of one’s own family 83
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement: Your job has more effect on your happiness than your social life does. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 426, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...s fund as it costs a fortune to satisfy ones needs. Meanwhile, drugs are also associ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, nevertheless, so, well, while, after all, for example, for instance, in summary, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 25.0 9.8082437276 255% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 52.1666666667 111% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2069.0 1977.66487455 105% => OK
No of words: 434.0 407.700716846 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76728110599 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56428161445 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49311417654 2.67179642975 93% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.502304147465 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 620.1 618.680645161 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.4368120721 48.9658058833 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.9565217391 100.406767564 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8695652174 20.6045352989 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.08695652174 5.45110844103 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.301151947788 0.236089414692 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0989158876433 0.076458572812 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0629401421028 0.0737576698707 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.214781170463 0.150856017488 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0534488686165 0.0645574589148 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 11.7677419355 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 58.1214874552 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.1575268817 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 10.9000537634 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.69 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 86.8835125448 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.002688172 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.