There is no shortage of debate whether it is better to be like a today’s parent or a parent in the past. Now, parents can be called PARENTS because they really take care of their children’s education. In the past, they did not have time to look after lots of children they had nor to take a look at their homework. I cling to this outlook because of two main reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
First of all, nowadays, parents are aware of the importance to have a kid, as life situations have become more and more difficult to deal with, people want their kids to be well-prepared to the upcoming future sending them to the best schools, signing them up to valuable courses, or so forth. To clarify my point let me take myself as an example. My mother, when I was 14, forced me to attend a recently-open English course in my hometown, I did not understand that in that time, but now that I am trying to get accepted in a foreign university I actually get what was her purpose. This happens just three years ago, and also this explains how parents are really worried about their children’s high-level education.
Secondly, today, parents have shortened the number of children they have because they want to focus on a little number (2-3 maximum) children and thus give their best shot as parents. It is common knowledge that people do not have as much time as they had in the past. So, they need to be sure that they will be able to bring up their children in the best way. For instance, my aunt is a single mother and has two kids, whom she loves a lot. But she also works in a company selling technological products. Then, the problem is that she needs to be responsible for both her family and her job. What she does is to send their kids to a garden and a school in the morning until she finishes her work and then she looks after her kids. In the garden, kids learn important knowledge for being the best in the future.
To sum up, parents are more involved in their children’s education today than in the past because they are constantly seeking out courses for their children, and because they have fewer kids now, which allow them to bring them up in the best way.
- TPO-41 - Integrated Writing Task Burning coal in power plants produces a waste product called coal ash, a material that contains small amounts of potentially harmful chemicals Environmentalists in the United States are concerned about the damage such harm 85
- TPO-16 - Integrated Writing TaskThe United Kingdom (sometimes referred to as Britain) has a long and rich history of human settlement. Traces of buildings, tools, and art can be found from periods going back many thousands of years: from the Stone Age, th 90
- TPO-48 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Because modern life is very complex, it is essential for young people to have the ability to plan and organize. 76
- TPO-20 - Integrated Writing Task In the United States, it had been common practice since the late 1960s no to suppress natural forest fires. The “let it burn” policy assumed that forest fire would burn themselves out quickly, without causing much dama 80
- TPO-01 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?At universities and colleges, sports and social activities are just as important as classes and libraries and should receive equal financial support.Use specific reaso 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, if, look, really, second, secondly, so, then, thus, well, for instance, first of all, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 58.0 43.0788530466 135% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1814.0 1977.66487455 92% => OK
No of words: 407.0 407.700716846 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.457002457 4.8611393121 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49157444576 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50665553356 2.67179642975 94% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 212.727598566 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.511056511057 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 552.6 618.680645161 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.9716509195 48.9658058833 139% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.705882353 100.406767564 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9411764706 20.6045352989 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.23529411765 5.45110844103 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.32348480893 0.236089414692 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101122097079 0.076458572812 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.124994524304 0.0737576698707 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.24090705528 0.150856017488 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.115108929208 0.0645574589148 178% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 11.7677419355 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 58.1214874552 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.88 10.9000537634 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.34 8.01818996416 92% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 86.8835125448 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.