Some people might claim that people can learn better from those at their same level. They cite advantages like both can share a common problem and confusion , and hence can learn and teach.
I do not agree with such people. I strongly agree that students can learn better from their teachers or supervisors than from their compatriots on the basis of three specific reasons.
First of all, it is easy to ask a dumb questions. Usually learners asknaive question, and feel embarassed when they realise the answer was so patent clear. Such embarrasment is magnified when he's learning with someone from the same level. For example, in a group study session, a student might refrain from clearing his doubts on an apparently easy question. But when working with a supervisor, the student does not compare his cognizance of the subject with his supervisors and confidently ask questions. So when working with his seniors he can clear his doubts more clearly.
Second of all, supervisors and teachers have more knowledge. For example, if a student asks a questio to hs fellow classmate, the classmate can give a partially correct answer. Even though the classmate might have tried the best, there is apossibility that he might have missed a concept too. But teachers are better experts of their subjects and they can answer more accurately. Disabusing a learned concept is usually tough, so it is essential to learn from accurate sources.
Lastly, teachers or supervisors are paid to help but a fellow co-worker can be irked with the constant stream of questions. For example, even if a particular student knows about American History, he is not obliged to share it with his classmates. He might dedicate more time on increasing his knowledge horizon. On the other hand, teachers are obliged to answer all the questions.
To conclude, the issue on if it is better to lean from a teacher or a friend is complex. Some have suggested some benifits. Nevertheless, I maintain that teachers can teach a student in a much better way.
- people learn better form higher-level individuals, such as teachers and supervisors or form persons who are in their own level 61
- A recent study indicates that children living in the Himalayan mountain region in Nepal have lower levels of tooth decay than children living in suburban areas in the United States, despite the fact that people in the Himalayan mountain region in Nepal re 65
- Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state, even if these areas could be developed for economic gain.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position 50
- Topic: The following is from a memo from the advertising director of the Super screen Movie Production Company.According to a recent report from our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen-produced movies than in any 47
- Essay topic: In surveys Mason City residents rank water sports (swimming, boating, and fishing) among their favorite recreational activities. The Mason River flowing through the city is rarely used for these pursuits, however, and the city park department 82
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 47, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to better', 'to well'
Suggestion: to better; to well
...eople might claim that people can learn better from those at their same level. They ci...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 157, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...can share a common problem and confusion , and hence can learn and teach. I do no...
^^
Line 2, column 74, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to better', 'to well'
Suggestion: to better; to well
... strongly agree that students can learn better from their teachers or supervisors than...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 40, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'question'?
Suggestion: question
... First of all, it is easy to ask a dumb questions. Usually learners asknaive question, a...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 67, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o ask a dumb questions. Usually learners asknaive question, and feel embarassed w...
^^
Line 4, column 194, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: he's
...ar. Such embarrasment is magnified when hes learning with someone from the same lev...
^^^
Line 4, column 508, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[3]
Message: “So when” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ervisors and confidently ask questions. So when working with his seniors he can clear h...
^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 109, Rule ID: FELLOW_CLASSMATE[1]
Message: Use simply 'classmate'.
Suggestion: classmate
...mple, if a student asks a questio to hs fellow classmate, the classmate can give a partially cor...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 56, Rule ID: FELLOW_CLASSMATE[1]
Message: Use simply 'co-worker'.
Suggestion: co-worker
...s or supervisors are paid to help but a fellow co-worker can be irked with the constant stream o...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, but, first, hence, if, lastly, nevertheless, second, so, for example, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 43.0788530466 70% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 52.1666666667 73% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1691.0 1977.66487455 86% => OK
No of words: 341.0 407.700716846 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95894428152 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29722995808 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68360687067 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 212.727598566 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.504398826979 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 504.9 618.680645161 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.8327239496 48.9658058833 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 76.8636363636 100.406767564 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.5 20.6045352989 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.13636363636 5.45110844103 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.53405017921 132% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 9.0 5.5376344086 163% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175642262338 0.236089414692 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0581936877285 0.076458572812 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0673856375723 0.0737576698707 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108954884199 0.150856017488 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0501706079136 0.0645574589148 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 11.7677419355 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 58.1214874552 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.1575268817 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.19 10.9000537634 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.81 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 86.8835125448 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Rates: 61.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.