People learn things better from those at their own level - such as fellows or co-workers-than from those at higher level, such as teachers or supervisors.
Opinions vary with the regard to the question of whether people should learn from close relatives or take into account the wisdom of grown-ups or supervisors. Although the opinions of teachers and supervisors based on their experience are highly valuable, I dare say that learning things from co-workers and generating ideas with fellows, who are not afraid of making their own mistakes, has its benefits. I firmly believe, that in order to succeed the one should behave appropriately with relatives in accordance with their “generation rules”.
To begin with, the opinions of experienced people, such as teachers or supervisors, are unquestionably a valuable thing, which should be taken into account. Their personal experience and special knowledge may foster the decrease in number of mistakes, which are taken by inexperienced people. For example, the supervisor or mentor may boost one’s career development through providing considerable number of valuable advises on the steps which should be taken further. Moreover, the lack of life experience make it hardly possible to make right career choices without comprehensive understanding of the possible consequences and results of those steps.
Nonetheless, learning things on one’s own level, cooperating with co-workers and fellows has its clear benefits. Making own mistakes usually is a more valuable thing and the easiest way to exclude repetition of them in the future. To be specific, the one’s life provides more lessons than a life of a teacher or a mentor, who obtained their personal life experience through making their own choices or taking advises from their relative or ancestors. Indeed, the more mistakes a person makes on his own, the better he understands the possible solutions of this mistakes.
In addition, the fellows usually better understand the generation with whom people on their level cooperate and may behave more appropriately than supervisors may advise them to behave. To be specific, in order to grow in a company where bosses are relatively young, one should behave himself in a specific manner, which might significantly differ from those of teacher’s.
All in all, besides that the successful person should take base his personal decisions on experience from supervisors, the fear of making one’s own mistakes is greatly exaggerated.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-12-28 | Winner_007 | 73 | view |
| 2020-12-28 | Winner_007 | 73 | view |
| 2020-12-28 | Winner_007 | 73 | view |
| 2020-12-28 | Winner_007 | 73 | view |
| 2020-12-28 | Winner_007 | 73 | view |
- As early as the twelfth century A D the settlements of Chaco Canyon in New Mexico in the American Southwest were notable for their great houses massive stone buildings that contain hundreds of rooms and often stand three of four stories high 3
- People learn things better from those at their own level such as fellows or co workers than from those at higher level such as teachers or supervisors 76
- Altruism is a type of behaviour in which 85
- In the 1950s Torreya taxifolia 3
- In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 34, Rule ID: WHETHER[3]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: whether; the question whether
Opinions vary with the regard to the question of whether people should learn from close relative...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 556, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...e understands the possible solutions of this mistakes. In addition, the fellows usu...
^^^^
Line 4, column 293, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a specific manner" with adverb for "specific"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...tively young, one should behave himself in a specific manner, which might significantly differ from ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, if, may, moreover, nonetheless, so, for example, in addition, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 43.0788530466 58% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 52.1666666667 111% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1980.0 1977.66487455 100% => OK
No of words: 364.0 407.700716846 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.43956043956 4.8611393121 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36792674256 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95224233671 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 212.727598566 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.508241758242 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 617.4 618.680645161 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 8.0 3.08781362007 259% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.1344086022 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 37.7299750915 48.9658058833 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.428571429 100.406767564 141% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 20.6045352989 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.64285714286 5.45110844103 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.263632268702 0.236089414692 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0928433208796 0.076458572812 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0688195123837 0.0737576698707 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145631485943 0.150856017488 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.065808320814 0.0645574589148 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 11.7677419355 146% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 58.1214874552 63% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.1575268817 144% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.57 10.9000537634 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.13 8.01818996416 114% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 86.8835125448 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 10.002688172 150% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.0537634409 123% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.247311828 146% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.