Non fiction books portray truth ,facts and knowledge which are important for real life whereas fiction books have some sorts of unrealistic view which may create an imaginary life dream among children. Whatever a child is learning about a real world or an imaginary world, he or she should not be forced to read any specific types of book. Therefore, I disagree with the statement that parents should force their children to read non-fiction believing that fiction is not good for the following three reasons.
Firstly, Forcing should not be an option for any book reading. For example, one of my friends was very good at drawing and always loved art . His parents have forced him to read fiction and nonfiction books, which was not his cup of tea. Eventually, he turned off his drawing and also gave up reading books in his later life. Forcing someone to do something is never appreciated because if someone does not get any interest, he will not practice it latter and will never get the actual benefit from that. Whatever the types of books children want to read, parents should let them read. Thus they will be accustomed to a reading habit which will help him to read other types of books in future.
Secondly, fiction books increase our depth of thinking and expand the dimensions for reading habit. For example, I read a science fiction book in my childhood related to a team who are working in space with aliens from other planets. This book has given me the opportunity to think largely about the outside world or planet and made me enthusiastic about astronomy and planet science. Thus I have grown an interest in this topic and read more books which were not only limited to fictions rather theory and science behind these. An interest in something can help a child to think bigger and eventually make him more eager to learn the non fictions about the topic. Therefore, they should not be forced by thinking that fiction is not good enough.
Lastly, nonfiction books often portrays- some truths or facts which are not suitable for children. For example, I was reading a literature when I was child which was full of sexual abuse. As a child, I found the book very much appropriate for me and it made a bad impact on myself. Therefore, the contents of nonfiction books might not be appropriate for a child and they may have a negative effect which will eventually ruin his career and future path.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 32, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
Non fiction books portray truth ,facts and knowledge which are important ...
^^
Line 3, column 140, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ery good at drawing and always loved art . His parents have forced him to read fic...
^^
Line 3, column 587, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
... to read, parents should let them read. Thus they will be accustomed to a reading ha...
^^^^
Line 3, column 684, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...l help him to read other types of books in future. Secondly, fiction books increase ou...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 386, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...tic about astronomy and planet science. Thus I have grown an interest in this topic ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, lastly, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, whereas, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 43.0788530466 91% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 52.1666666667 82% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.0752688172 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1996.0 1977.66487455 101% => OK
No of words: 422.0 407.700716846 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.72985781991 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53239876712 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40329857693 2.67179642975 90% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 212.727598566 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.492890995261 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 602.1 618.680645161 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.94265232975 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.6249595469 48.9658058833 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.8 100.406767564 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1 20.6045352989 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.9 5.45110844103 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.435210534937 0.236089414692 184% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.144580174279 0.076458572812 189% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0883324960896 0.0737576698707 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.290580895218 0.150856017488 193% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101826126536 0.0645574589148 158% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 11.7677419355 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 58.1214874552 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.15 10.9000537634 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.45 8.01818996416 93% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 86.8835125448 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.