Technology has changed the way people learn today. Some people say that reading is the most effective way to acquire knowledge when compared to TV or video lectures. To my knowledge, both options have their own advantages and disadvantages. Thus an effective way to education always depending upon the type of subject that is being taught and individuals ability to perceive the ideas behind the subject that is being imparted.
It is an undeniable fact that reading is the most traditional and proven way of learning things. People who advocate it says that books are the treasure of knowledge, that is, such in-depth details can never be obtained anywhere. Besides, it is also been emphasized by various research reports that while reading brain stores the acquired information for more time than the other mode of studying such as videos. Typically, a bright student who has the acumen to understand the tricky concepts and monotonous theories generally do not find fault with reading.
On the other hand, in the current digital world, the way of educating the pupil has dramatically changed. Certainly, video lessons are boon to those who do not have time to spend time reading the whole theory and slow learners. As a matter of fact, nowadays, schools use projectors to impart subject knowledge to children as much as they use blackboards. For instance, explaining theories through visual representation makes it easier for students to grasp even difficult concepts quickly. As a result, it will help teachers to make the students understand the technical details better by preparing videos with pictures, diagrams, and graphs.
In conclusion, both ways of learning things have their own traits. The difficulty level and the intricacies of the idea that is being taught and the personnel abilities of the students determine the best mode of imparting skills.
- Your best friend just had her first baby You are currently overseas but will be returning to your hometown in a week Write to your friend In your lettercongratulate your friendtell her when you will be returning homeask when you could drop in to meet he 87
- You saw a brochure for a one week walking tour in the mountains You re very interested in taking part but you re not very fit and are worried you wouldn t be able to keep up Write to the tour operator In your letter Explain why you re interested in the to 61
- In Britain, when someone gets old they often go to live in a home with other old people where there are nurses to look after them. Sometimes the government has to pay for this care.Who do you think should pay for this care, the government or the family?Gi 67
- You received a letter form an airline company for your feedback for your latest flight with them. Write a letter to the Customer Service Manager•Say what reasons made you choose this airline.•Something that you liked about the flight•Suggest an impr 84
- You have received a letter from your bank, asking you to acknowledge receipt of a new bank card. However, the card was missing from the envelope.Write a letter to the bank's head office. In your letter: explain why you are writing express concern ab 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 242, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...their own advantages and disadvantages. Thus an effective way to education always de...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, if, so, thus, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a matter of fact, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 9.8082437276 20% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 43.0788530466 42% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 52.1666666667 63% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1570.0 1977.66487455 79% => OK
No of words: 303.0 407.700716846 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18151815182 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74847553892 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 212.727598566 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.594059405941 0.524837075471 113% => OK
syllable_count: 470.7 618.680645161 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.8749562343 48.9658058833 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.666666667 100.406767564 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2 20.6045352989 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.33333333333 5.45110844103 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0940348539331 0.236089414692 40% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0275891549803 0.076458572812 36% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0400676233333 0.0737576698707 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0506244986391 0.150856017488 34% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0373742475829 0.0645574589148 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 11.7677419355 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 10.9000537634 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.01818996416 113% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 86.8835125448 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.