Schools should ask students to evaluate their teachers. Do you agree or disagree? Use specific reasons and example to support your answer.
The school as an academic center the main responsibility, of which is to prepare students for having both a successful professional and personal life. The school form a fundamental part of a person's education. Experiences acquired at school make students decide their path. Quality of education is essential for development of science and technology. Indeed, not until education gets improved can the society progress. Bearing this fact in mind a question that is a matter of debate a controversial one is whether students should be required to assess teachers at schools or not. Agreement is yet to be reached on this issue; however, I am personally on the belief that students at schools are not enough informed and experienced people to evaluate teachers. In the following paragraphs, I will pinpoint the most outstanding reasons.
One compelling reason, lending credence to the stance taken above is that students during their education at school are not mature enough mentally. In fact, maturity plays a pivotal role in evaluating, not only about teacher but also in every single facet of their life. Scientifically speaking, students at an early age are not a good decision maker. Indeed, students at classes are bombarded with theoretical and various lessons and cannot judge properly. Vast majorities of students are interested in different subjects and this survey behalf of students may cause serious problem between teacher and students. Delving further into the issue reveals that the results are not reliable. There is possibility that students may judge their teacher based on grade they receive. In order to prevent from this kind of evaluating, impartial judgment is the best substitution. Actually, teachers should be evaluated based on their performance. Indeed, myriads of students do not perform well at school because of different problems. A noteworthy refreshingly intelligible statistic, revealed by a recent social research conducted in our country; show that teachers who have been evaluated based on impartial judgment have better performance and teach successfully at the rest of their teaching.
Another reason that is equally important if not more is that relation between teachers and students plays a key role in the schools. Broadly speaking, many students are not interested in whole subjects and may avoid evaluating and teachers take into account the purpose intentionally. Going into the depth, this procedure will harm relations in the school and definitely harms learning process. Finally, not until assessment holds based on an impartial judgment, can the schools and teachers progress. However, what I alluded to above cannot overgeneralized to all contexts. Alongside with the innumerable benefits it has, indisputably, crowds of students spend most of their time at school with their teachers. They can assess their teaching style, manner, analyzing their characters and finally judge them based on their performance. Nevertheless, it does not make those preceding benefits pale.
To wrap it up, evaluating teachers at schools is essential for improvement of education in every society. Contemplating all the aforementioned reasons one soon realize that students are not mature enough mentally to judge teachers. Perhaps they assess based on grade or insignificantly. In addition, the results will not be exact and may lead to some problem between students and teachers. In fact, it can harms relation and learning process. I highly suggest that evaluating should hold in an impartial judgment. If schools do not reverse such a trend, we will soon witness a trials and tribulations between students and teachers.
- Workers in the small town of Leeville take fewer sick days than workers in the large city of Masontown, 50 miles away. Moreover, relative to population size, the diagnosis of stress-related illness is proportionally much lower in Leeville than in Masontow 59
- Learn by doing or reading or listening. Which do you prefer? Why? 70
- "Two years ago, the town of Seaside Vista opened a new municipal golf course and resort hotel. Since then, the Seaside Vista Tourism Board has reported a 20% increase in visitors. In addition, local banks reported a steep rise in the number of new busines 29
- "The surface of a section of Route 101, paved just two years ago by Good Intentions Roadways, is now badly cracked with a number of dangerous potholes. In another part of the state, a section of Route 40, paved by Appian Roadways more than four years ago, 69
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The opinions of celebrities, such as famous entertainers and athletes, are more important to younger people than they are to older people.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 192, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...The school form a fundamental part of a persons education. Experiences acquired at scho...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 387, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to process'
Suggestion: to process
...he school and definitely harms learning process. Finally, not until assessment holds ba...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 407, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'harm'
Suggestion: harm
... students and teachers. In fact, it can harms relation and learning process. I highly...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 435, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to process'
Suggestion: to process
...act, it can harms relation and learning process. I highly suggest that evaluating shoul...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 633, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ulations between students and teachers.
^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['actually', 'also', 'but', 'finally', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'nevertheless', 'so', 'well', 'broadly speaking', 'in addition', 'in fact', 'kind of']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.242519685039 0.229887763892 105% => OK
Verbs: 0.15905511811 0.158761421928 100% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0724409448819 0.0866891130778 84% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0850393700787 0.046263068375 184% => Less adverbs wanted.
Pronouns: 0.0393700787402 0.0685040099705 57% => OK
Prepositions: 0.127559055118 0.118717715034 107% => OK
Participles: 0.0535433070866 0.0351676179071 152% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.96936290064 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0173228346457 0.0309702414327 56% => OK
Particles: 0.00157480314961 0.00188951952338 83% => OK
Determiners: 0.0771653543307 0.0887237588012 87% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0267716535433 0.0209618222197 128% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00787401574803 0.0139019557991 57% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 3673.0 2387.08602151 154% => OK
No of words: 570.0 408.028673835 140% => OK
Chars per words: 6.44385964912 5.86048508987 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.88617158649 4.48200974243 109% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.438596491228 0.338922669872 129% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.361403508772 0.251872472559 143% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.264912280702 0.174417080927 152% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.159649122807 0.112833075102 141% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96936290064 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 282.0 212.727598566 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.494736842105 0.524397521467 94% => OK
Word variations: 60.3368032125 59.2087087015 102% => OK
How many sentences: 34.0 20.6684587814 165% => OK
Sentence length: 16.7647058824 20.5533526081 82% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.7199031426 48.84282405 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.029411765 120.699889404 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7647058824 20.5533526081 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.411764705882 0.644075263715 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.5376344086 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.54480286738 90% => OK
Readability: 52.9050567595 45.7405998639 116% => OK
Elegance: 1.49444444444 1.45489161554 103% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225228337174 0.300154397459 75% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0557672210002 0.103427244359 54% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0546683940313 0.0752933317313 73% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.371634997353 0.497263757937 75% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.109472861431 0.151897553556 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0749010161006 0.114077575197 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0516911200753 0.0781384742642 66% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.501539253914 0.336927656856 149% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0156654666039 0.067059652881 23% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.186230859436 0.210909579961 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0343230542302 0.0618886996521 55% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8870967742 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.86379928315 259% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 12.0 4.91756272401 244% => Less neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 11.0 8.42114695341 131% => OK
Negative topic words: 10.0 2.4623655914 406% => Less negative topic words wanted.
Neutral topic words: 7.0 2.75985663082 254% => OK
Total topic words: 28.0 13.6433691756 205% => OK
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations to cover all aspects.