There has been no shortage of opinions from teachers and parents all around the world on what time school should start. Although some believe the earlier students go to class, the better they are able to acquire knowledge, I strongly agree with the opposite idea that classes that start at a later time are more effective in maximizing students' productivity on a school day.
To begin, there are several factors that have negative influences on students' performance when they start school day early in the morning. For most students as well as parents, waking up early to prepare for school appears an exhausting daily task, despite the fact that classes have not even begun. Since students are always under a lot of assignments and homework that need to be finished between each school day, they tend to stay up late until midnight or even pull an all nighter in order to get their work done. As a result, when the alarm goes off every early morning, the last thing students want to do is to get up. This often leads to the reality that students do not have sufficient time to sleep or have a proper morning routine that prepares them well for the new day. It's not uncommon to see students try to sleep or students with an empty stomach in a morning class. Simply put, attending school early does not seem to encourage students' learning, yet it is likely to ruin students' motivation to start a productive and energetic day.
On the other hand, having more time for the beginning of the day is proved to improve schoolers’ performance as it helps them to be more well-prepared, both physically and mentally. A recent research conducted by a renowned university points out that students who go to a school with later opening time are less susceptible to anxiety and depression as compared to their peers who attend a school that starts much earlier. By being able to have adequate sleep and go through a healthy morning routine, such as eating breakfast on time and exercising regularly, these students’ well-being is always in a wonderful condition with a strong body and low stress level, thus significantly facilitating their learning process at school. Moreover, if students arrive to school an hour later than usual, they can avoid traffic congestion that happens at peak hour every morning. Consequently, students can eliminate both the stress of being in jammed traffic right before school and the fear of arriving late. There would be nothing better prepare them for classes than a good state of mind.
In conclusion, it is clear that starting school day at a later time brings substantial benefits to students’ health and gives them energy for studying. All schools should consider lowering their school schedule for the purpose of offering the best possible support for their attenders.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is important to know about events happening around the world even if it is unlikely that they will affect your daily life 76
- Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- TOEFL T P O 2 Integrated Writing Task 52
- A Historical Person You Admire 41
- TOEFL TPO 16 Integrated Writing Task 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 70, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...actors that have negative influences on students performance when they start school day ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, if, moreover, so, thus, well, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 43.0788530466 72% => OK
Preposition: 68.0 52.1666666667 130% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2335.0 1977.66487455 118% => OK
No of words: 476.0 407.700716846 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90546218487 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67091256922 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59126456335 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 255.0 212.727598566 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.535714285714 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 698.4 618.680645161 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.1344086022 139% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 58.3629023756 48.9658058833 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.352941176 100.406767564 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.0 20.6045352989 136% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.47058823529 5.45110844103 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181362415615 0.236089414692 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0697898431227 0.076458572812 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0492316108849 0.0737576698707 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107171850595 0.150856017488 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0781893210909 0.0645574589148 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 11.7677419355 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 58.1214874552 89% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.1575268817 128% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 10.9000537634 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 86.8835125448 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.002688172 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.0537634409 131% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.