In the 90s, smoking portrayed the social status of people. Those who smoke were seen as being wealthy and charismatic, little were the concerns regarding the danger of smoking. In today's society, most of the citizens have a clear knowledge of the harmful effects of smoking on the smokers, the ones around them and the environment. This left room to a great debate, whether smoking should be banned in all public spaces or not. In my opinion, smoking should be forbidden in all public spaces.
First of all, studies have shown that the people around a smoker get harmed more than they do. This is due to the fact that smokers inhale smoke but exhale the majority of it through their mouth and nose but the others breath that smoke with oxygen without being able to remove it. Theis smokes coupled with the smokes of cars and factories kills not only the non-smokers but also the plants that actually transforms co2 into fresh o2. It is a vicious cycle that will keep increasing and the aptitude to regenerate will also reduce.
Secondly, not only adults are in public places but also kids. These ones lack the immune system to fight the smokes that they keep inhaling. Most of these public paces are confined they do not have the best air circuits this enhances the toxication that these kids have. The number of kids having breathing problems and lung disease knows a huge rise and one of the main causes is being in direct contact with smoke sources.
Finally, I believe that this banning will have great benefits not only on non-smokers but also on those who smoke. If they get used to not smoking for long periods of time eventually their consumption of cigarettes will diminish. Moreover, their spendings on those dangerous products will also decrease and this law will help them quit for good. In addition, it will help them improve their working capacities by reinforcing their concentration on their jobs as they would not need constantly to go and smoke and interrupt their job.
In conclusion, the law of forbidding smoking in public spaces will improve the lives of everyone whether they are smoker non-smokers and even animals and nature.
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterward are poor decision makers.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the posi 50
- Governments should not fund any scientific research whose consequences are unclear.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should 16
- People's behavior is largely determined by forces not of their own making.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting 16
- Governments should not fund any scientific research whose consequences are unclear.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should 16
- People work because they need money to live. What are some other reasons that people work? Discuss one or more of these reasons. Use specific examples and details to support your answer. 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 213, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'others'' or 'other's'?
Suggestion: others'; other's
...it through their mouth and nose but the others breath that smoke with oxygen without b...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...titude to regenerate will also reduce. Secondly, not only adults are in public ...
^^^
Line 5, column 63, Rule ID: THESE_ONES[1]
Message: This phrase is probably grammatically incorrect. Write 'These' instead.
Suggestion: These
...lts are in public places but also kids. These ones lack the immune system to fight the smo...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 535, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o go and smoke and interrupt their job. In conclusion, the law of forbidding smo...
^^^^^
Line 10, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n-smokers and even animals and nature.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, finally, first, if, moreover, regarding, second, secondly, so, in addition, in conclusion, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 43.0788530466 95% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 52.1666666667 90% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1793.0 1977.66487455 91% => OK
No of words: 372.0 407.700716846 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.81989247312 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39173103935 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3598215926 2.67179642975 88% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.537634408602 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 537.3 618.680645161 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.5078129482 48.9658058833 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.6111111111 100.406767564 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6666666667 20.6045352989 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.72222222222 5.45110844103 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.266307881573 0.236089414692 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0946591503562 0.076458572812 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0862525468814 0.0737576698707 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152156424442 0.150856017488 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0856030146331 0.0645574589148 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 58.1214874552 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 10.9000537634 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 86.8835125448 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.