Some people believe that the Earth is being harmed (damaged) by human activity. Others feel that human activity makes the Earth a better place to live. What is your opinion? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Needless to say, one of the most important things which all people have to consider, because of its impact on all aspects of human life, is the earth. therefore, all governments have always been trying to make new laws in order to protect the earth. In this regard, some people believe that human activity leads to damage earth, while other people think that human activity triggers to convert earth to a better place to live. I agree with the first view and I will discuss my reasons in the following paragraphs.
some individuals believe that human activities cause to produce new technologies which help people to protect the earth. Such people wrongly believe that economic growth leads to destroy the environment at the beginning of the development but in the development process economic growth trigger to improve the environment state, since at the beginning of the development the main aim of economic growth is reducing income inequality that after solving this problem governments try to improve environmental situation via using environmentally friendly technologies which all companies are able to use in the high level of development. I disagree with this approach, because the global economic system has been established based on gaining profits by companies and green technologies cannot provide a high level of profits, hence these companies do not use green technologies even in the high level of development. You can take my cousin's speeches as the best example for this case. he has a big company in my coutry, once I asked him about using green technologies in his company and he told me there was a lot of green technologies, but they cannot use, because via these technologies the profits of the company would decrease significantly. thus, because of low-efficiency companies do not like to use green technologies.
human activities are the most important factor which damage the earth. this topic has been discussed by several economists and the majority of them believe that human activities lead to destroy woodlands as the most important thing to have clear air and the earth because individuals remove forests in order to establish new factories in order to produce more goods to gain more profits and human remove forests to make more house for human population which has been increased. therefore, they have posed that human activities damage the environment. I agree with this approach because more human activities lead to use more fossil fuels that have a negative impact on the earth global pollution. By way of illustration, I can refer to some statistics which have been published by several international organizations. based on these statistics the rate of global pollution has increased since the industrial revolution. thus, human activities lead to damage earth in order to answer iniduals' d demands.
In the brief, as I discussed in the previous paragraphs, some people believe that human activities damage the earth. I argued that this statement is true for a couple of reasons. first, companies usually do not use green technologies, because of their low-efficiency, second, human remove forests and derive fossil fuels in order to supply economic markets.
- The following appeared in a memo from the manager of UpperCuts hair salon: “According to a nationwide demographic study, more and more people today are movingfrom suburbs to downtown areas. In order to boost sagging profits at UpperCuts, we shouldtake a 55
- Woven baskets characterized by a particular distinctive pattern have previously been found only in the immediate vicinity of the prehistoric village of Palea and therefore were believed to have been made only by the Palean people. Recently, however, archa 59
- “Schools should be responsible not only for teaching academic skills but also for teaching ethical and social values 58
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? it is more important for students to understand concepts and ideas than its for them to learn facts. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- do you agree or disagree with the following statement? people learn things better from those at their own level than from those at a higher level. use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 152, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Therefore
...ll aspects of human life, is the earth. therefore, all governments have always been tryin...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Some
...reasons in the following paragraphs. some individuals believe that human activiti...
^^^^
Line 3, column 54, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'producing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'cause' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: producing
...als believe that human activities cause to produce new technologies which help people to p...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 981, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: He
...ches as the best example for this case. he has a big company in my coutry, once I ...
^^
Line 3, column 1242, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Thus
...e company would decrease significantly. thus, because of low-efficiency companies do...
^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Human
... not like to use green technologies. human activities are the most important facto...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 72, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...mportant factor which damage the earth. this topic has been discussed by several eco...
^^^^
Line 5, column 479, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Therefore
...an population which has been increased. therefore, they have posed that human activities ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 819, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Based
...by several international organizations. based on these statistics the rate of global ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 921, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Thus
...reased since the industrial revolution. thus, human activities lead to damage earth ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 992, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...damage earth in order to answer iniduals d demands. In the brief, as I discuss...
^^
Line 7, column 180, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: First
...tement is true for a couple of reasons. first, companies usually do not use green tec...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 359, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ls in order to supply economic markets.
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, if, second, so, therefore, thus, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 43.0788530466 97% => OK
Preposition: 75.0 52.1666666667 144% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.0752688172 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2694.0 1977.66487455 136% => OK
No of words: 519.0 407.700716846 127% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19075144509 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.7730044521 4.48103885553 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8916617876 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 212.727598566 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.42774566474 0.524837075471 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 857.7 618.680645161 139% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 116.850716729 48.9658058833 239% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 134.7 100.406767564 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.95 20.6045352989 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.85 5.45110844103 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 13.0 5.5376344086 235% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.288705386012 0.236089414692 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114590126781 0.076458572812 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.117385359949 0.0737576698707 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.211589640024 0.150856017488 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0858851102404 0.0645574589148 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 11.7677419355 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 58.1214874552 65% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.1575268817 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 10.9000537634 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.77 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 86.8835125448 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.