Some people say that the Internet provides people with a lot of valuable information. Others think access to so much information creates problems. Which view do you agree with? Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion.
In olden days, getting an information was considered a herculean task. But nowadays, with the increase in technological advancement, valuable information is available at the click of a button in the form of internet which provides the essential data that a person might need. An internet has been considered as a storehouse of data and anybody in the world has access to it. I do not agree to the fact that access to much information creates problems as it depends on the user rather than being general.
A school student or a college goer, in order to complete the task assigned by his institution relies completely on the internet for reliable source of information. Even though there is a pool of data available, only the essential things can be used for the specific purposes. For instance, when I was asked to do an assignment in Science, I searched for the information from the internet, summarized it and presented in the best possible form.
Moreover, parents should monitor the usage of internet by their children because if the kids feel that they are not been watched by elders, they have the tendency to be at fault. In many households, kids are allowed to watch cartoon programs and play games online. many evidences show youngsters to commit suicide due to addiction of a game. Hence, such things can be avoided provided elders watch their kids often.
To sum up, it can be reiterated that falling into trouble or making the best use of resources available are solely in the hands of the user. internet can be considered a boon for those who look only for valuable resources whereas it takes the form of a bane for those who do illegal activities and thus fall into trouble.
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones 50
- In any field of endeavor, it is impossible to make a significant contribution without first being strongly influenced by past achievements withing that field. 50
- People who are the most deeply committed to an idea or policy are also the most critical of it 58
- Claim: It is no longer possible for a society to regard any living man or woman as a hero.Reason: The reputation of anyone who is subjected to media scrutiny will eventually be diminished. 50
- Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state, even if these areas could be developed for economic gain.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 266, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Many
...cartoon programs and play games online. many evidences show youngsters to commit sui...
^^^^
Line 13, column 142, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Internet
...le are solely in the hands of the user. internet can be considered a boon for those who ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, look, moreover, so, thus, whereas, for instance, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 43.0788530466 44% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 52.1666666667 79% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1410.0 1977.66487455 71% => OK
No of words: 294.0 407.700716846 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.79591836735 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.48103885553 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71635642971 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 212.727598566 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.574829931973 0.524837075471 110% => OK
syllable_count: 449.1 618.680645161 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6003584229 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.7168607254 48.9658058833 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.461538462 100.406767564 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6153846154 20.6045352989 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.69230769231 5.45110844103 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 11.8709677419 34% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.147070900449 0.236089414692 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0509308637995 0.076458572812 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0493153258147 0.0737576698707 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0867515371006 0.150856017488 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0702501881094 0.0645574589148 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 11.7677419355 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.86 10.9000537634 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 86.8835125448 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.