Some students prefer to study alone. Others prefer to study with a group of students. Which do you prefer?
Getting information about something needs a context to learn about this, so studying as an implement can help students to better learn. Correct studying is a significant factor to get information that requires some elements to study such as condition, material, and how to the study are involved in the study, students can receive all data without any distractions and with a high efficiency. On the contrary, a controversial question raises in this issue how students contribute to study? Some people prefer to study alone, but some people prefer to study with a group of students. I firmly subscribe the second notion and explain my reasons hereunder.
First and foremost, finding the best solution for every issue requires that people receive all probable solutions and make a decision to take one as the best solution. In other words, all students have different ideas about every question, but when negotiating together, they can get a better solution that is solving questions properly. Studying with a group of students gives an opportunity to them that with intercourse each other to justify their wrong ideas. Also, some students have more knowledge than others can help weaker students to improve their quality study to get a decent grade in their exam. As the statistic standpoint of Asian education shows that learning courses with a group of students can get a better score than students studying lonely in the same exam.
Secondly, doing every work needs a motivation to persuade people that do this with high interests. When students who are studying with a group, with their attempts encourages each other to study more. On the other hand, studying lonely is creating a condition that students are reluctant to study because there are not any competitors that students see them to take more efforts. For example, always I tried to study with my friends who took more efforts in order to incentive me to more learn, hence I got the best grade in the exams.
All in all, getting the best knowledge and a high score should study with our friends, as students not only can get the best solution with debating but also are encouraged to more efforts to get the best scores.
- The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many friends easily. 60
- What are important qualities of a good supervisor(boss)? Why these qualities are important. 73
- Life today is easier and more comfortable than it was when your grandparents were children 73
- It is often necessary, even desirable, for political leaders to withhold information from thepublic." 66
- The following appeared in a letter from the owner of the Sunnyside Towers apartment building to its manager.One month ago, all the showerheads on the first five floors of Sunnyside Towers were modified to restrict the water flow to approximately 1/3 of it 57
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 609, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...dy to get a decent grade in their exam. As the statistic standpoint of Asian educa...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, second, secondly, so, for example, such as, in other words, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 43.0788530466 58% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1821.0 1977.66487455 92% => OK
No of words: 369.0 407.700716846 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93495934959 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38284983912 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56895417664 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 212.727598566 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.474254742547 0.524837075471 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 563.4 618.680645161 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.59856630824 21% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.3237231825 48.9658058833 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.4 100.406767564 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6 20.6045352989 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.2 5.45110844103 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.3926519601 0.236089414692 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.153558995808 0.076458572812 201% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.147465404533 0.0737576698707 200% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.239394677984 0.150856017488 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.113593574681 0.0645574589148 176% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 11.7677419355 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 58.1214874552 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 10.9000537634 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 86.8835125448 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.