Universities always assign some works for students to do during their long vacation time. Some of them make their students take additional courses, while others encourage them to do volunteer works to benefit society. As for me, I think it is better for the university to make students take a course that is no connection with their major study.
First of all, it can help students to discover and develop their second interests by attending classed that are in other study fields. For example, my historical-major friend, Frank, was busy working on his research and presentation. Thanks to the rule which students should take courses out of their major studies, he had a chance to enroll in a law class and he found that it was really interesting. Since then, he has attended several law classes during the summer and winter vacations. Finally, he learned all the law and debating skills. Thus, this rule really allowed Frank to find his second intrigue.
Secondly, it can make students easy to have a better career future if they possess distinctive fields of knowledge by taking non-major courses. Take myself for example; when I took the programming course which all the chemical engineering students were legislated to take, I learned lots of coding skills and how to stimulate chemical engineering reactions. After graduating, I got a bunch of offers not only in the chemical engineering field but also in the computer science field. Furthermore, these computer science abilities also allowed me to get higher salary payments. I even got promoted three years after work for the Apple Corporation. Hence, the rule that students should take additional courses in other major study fields really let me acquire a decent job with decent pay.
Last but not least, students can build further social connections with others by taking the course that is unrelated to their major studies. For instance, when my sister's college force her, major in environmental science, to take the math courses, she became friends with other class takers from other departments. Moreover, they even teamed up to participate in a science research competition. With their collaboration, they became best friends. Therefore, this rule really made my sister meet others who studied in different majors, allowing her to wider her friendship zone.
In conclusion, I hold the profound conviction that it is better for the university to have students join a course that is not directly related to their major of study. After all, students can find their second interests, build extensive social connections, and have a better career future easily by taking this kind of class.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is beneficial for the public to know celebrities such as musicians or sportsmen s political views 70
- Many people believe that teachers should teach students how to judge right from wrong and how to behave while others think they should only teach academic subjects What is your opinion 73
- If you are a teacher and is going to do a project with two students which of the following method would you choose a instruct them separately and divide the projects into three parts so you only have to do your own part b finish all parts of the project w 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People in the future will read fewer books 82
- Agree or disagree students are more interested in politics than they were in the past 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 497, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this computer' or 'these computers'?
Suggestion: this computer; these computers
...he computer science field. Furthermore, these computer science abilities also allowed me to ge...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, furthermore, hence, if, moreover, really, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, thus, while, after all, as for, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion, kind of, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 53.0 43.0788530466 123% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2230.0 1977.66487455 113% => OK
No of words: 434.0 407.700716846 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13824884793 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56428161445 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71195318083 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 212.727598566 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.52534562212 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 676.8 618.680645161 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 17.0 9.59856630824 177% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.0942468734 48.9658058833 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.363636364 100.406767564 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7272727273 20.6045352989 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.63636363636 5.45110844103 177% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.280106732193 0.236089414692 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0894838582333 0.076458572812 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.096040267839 0.0737576698707 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185700592463 0.150856017488 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.105146123674 0.0645574589148 163% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 11.7677419355 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 10.9000537634 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.93 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 86.8835125448 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.