For some social events like world climate conference, there is no definitely right answer for it as the opinions differ according to the standing of everyone. At this time, there might be both positive and negative effects if teachers let students know their own views on these events. In my view, the effect of teachers making their social or political views known to student would be generally positive rather than negative.
Admittedly, students can get access to mature view points of social or political events if teachers decide to spread their own opinions to the students. Students in elementary and middle school are not old enough to view and experience various social events. At the same time they are usually quite dependent on their teachers who deliver lessons to them day and day. If teachers' mature views can be effectively taught to students, they can be encouraged to contemplate on social events at an early stage, leading to nourishment of their critical thinking ability.
However, teachers are not perfect. Although most teachers have received professional training on teaching before taking their jobs, not all of them have received professional lessons on social and political events. This means that their views on social events might not always be well-considered enough. Some deeper aspects of impact of social events could be ignored by them. In some extreme cases, opinions of some teachers might be biased over specific problems. If such views are delivered to very young children in elementary schools, their mind development can be severely harmed.
To tackle this contradiction and try to make the most contribution to students in schools, there can be another solution to this problem. If teachers only tell students their own opinions and force students to acknowledge them, it may cause damage to students' esteem as well as healthy thinking ability development. But if the personal opinions of teachers are followed by encouragement of creative thinking and discussion, then it would be nice chance to introduce various types of views, in addition to the comparison of multiple views. In this way, students' interest in social events would be effectively utilized and their critical thinking ability and even persuasion ability can be honed.
In sum, there can be positive effect if teachers let their views on social or political events known to students, if accompanied by encouragement of critical thinking and comparison of different views.
- Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom 73
- "A jazz music club in Monroe would be a tremendously profitable enterprise. Currently, the nearest jazz club is 65 miles away; thus, the proposed new jazz club in Monroe, the C-Note, would have the local market all to itself. Plus, jazz is extremely popul 82
- Some people believe that college students should consider only their own talents and interests when choosing a field of study. Others believe that college students should base their choice of a field of study on the availability of jobs in that field.Writ 66
- The surest indicator of a great nation is represented not by the achievements of its rulers, artists, or scientists, but by the general welfare of its people.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statemen 50
- The following is a recommendation from the personnel director to the president of Acme Publishing Company."Many other companies have recently stated that having their employees take the Easy Read Speed-Reading Course has greatly improved productivity. One 49
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, so, then, well, in addition, as well as, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 11.0286738351 18% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 43.0788530466 65% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 52.1666666667 111% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2094.0 1977.66487455 106% => OK
No of words: 398.0 407.700716846 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26130653266 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46653527281 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74847729134 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 212.727598566 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.477386934673 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 648.9 618.680645161 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.7682160975 48.9658058833 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.333333333 100.406767564 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1111111111 20.6045352989 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.11111111111 5.45110844103 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.387038242872 0.236089414692 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.148150960664 0.076458572812 194% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108805938974 0.0737576698707 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.265363438623 0.150856017488 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0634755339695 0.0645574589148 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 11.7677419355 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 10.9000537634 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 86.8835125448 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.