No one can deny that television has a tangible impact on today's society.
Some people argue the idea that TV is still one of the most important ways to access accurate information, while others oppose this claim.
In my point of view, I would agree with the above-mentioned statement that whatever is portrayed on television does not provide a true picture of human nature.
I feel this way for several causes, which I will explore in greater detail in the subsequent paragraphs.
First and foremost, some individuals take advantage of the huge diversity of news channels on television to know just the outlines of the events taking place in the world because the majority of media channels are now biased and have their own agenda that serves a group of parties or certain leaders.
Also, news channels manipulate their viewers into believing things that are not in any way related to the actual issue at hand.
As a result, many people have lost faith in the news and information provided by these outlets.
Drawing from what happened in Syria during the war, there were many news channels to report what was happening in the area moment by moment, but it was very clear that all of these news channels were biased and rarely until people find a reliable source that gave the complete picture of what was going on.
To continue, despite the development of photography tools and the use of modern equipment that contributed to some extent in showing some emotions and expressions, but in my opinion, they are not sufficient and cannot replace physical emotions for humans.
For example, movies and series were shown on television do not depict normal human nature. These films exaggerate scenarios and emotions that rarely happen in the real world.
From what I have deliberated above, I reckon that our modern world maintains television as an important source of information on the other hand, TV can't provide us a realistic picture of human nature because of experts' influence, people's natural diversity, and sponsors' beliefs.
- The expression Never never give up means to keep trying and never stop working for your goals Do you agree or disagree 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Improving transportation is the best way for governments to promote economic growth Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People today spend too much time on personal enjoyment doing things they like to do rather than doing things they should do Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 78
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement As long as they meet deadlines and attend meetings company employees should be allowed to work any hours they choose Use specific reasons and examples to support your answers 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more interesting to read a good book or see a good movie the second time than the first Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 58, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'todays'' or 'today's'?
Suggestion: todays'; today's
...hat television has a tangible impact on todays society. Some people argue the idea th...
^^^^^^
Line 11, column 149, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...ce of information on the other hand, TV cant provide us a realistic picture of human...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, so, still, while, for example, i feel, i reckon, as a result, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 43.0788530466 65% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1703.0 1977.66487455 86% => OK
No of words: 341.0 407.700716846 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99413489736 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29722995808 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59596890037 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.589442815249 0.524837075471 112% => OK
syllable_count: 542.7 618.680645161 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.6003584229 58% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.1344086022 139% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 87.0864831966 48.9658058833 178% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.916666667 100.406767564 141% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.4166666667 20.6045352989 138% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.33333333333 5.45110844103 171% => OK
Paragraphs: 11.0 4.53405017921 243% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198725286728 0.236089414692 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0635485138533 0.076458572812 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0709003852521 0.0737576698707 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0667957033472 0.150856017488 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0703757638012 0.0645574589148 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 11.7677419355 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 58.1214874552 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.1575268817 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.29 8.01818996416 116% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 86.8835125448 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.0537634409 131% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 58, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'todays'' or 'today's'?
Suggestion: todays'; today's
...hat television has a tangible impact on todays society. Some people argue the idea th...
^^^^^^
Line 11, column 149, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...ce of information on the other hand, TV cant provide us a realistic picture of human...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, so, still, while, for example, i feel, i reckon, as a result, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 43.0788530466 65% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1703.0 1977.66487455 86% => OK
No of words: 341.0 407.700716846 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99413489736 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29722995808 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59596890037 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.589442815249 0.524837075471 112% => OK
syllable_count: 542.7 618.680645161 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.6003584229 58% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.1344086022 139% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 87.0864831966 48.9658058833 178% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.916666667 100.406767564 141% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.4166666667 20.6045352989 138% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.33333333333 5.45110844103 171% => OK
Paragraphs: 11.0 4.53405017921 243% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198725286728 0.236089414692 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0635485138533 0.076458572812 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0709003852521 0.0737576698707 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0667957033472 0.150856017488 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0703757638012 0.0645574589148 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 11.7677419355 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 58.1214874552 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.1575268817 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.29 8.01818996416 116% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 86.8835125448 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.0537634409 131% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.