there are myriad considerations and factors to take into account when working at a today’s business such as the time you spend on an activity, the people who you work with, and so on. As far as I am concerned, working slowly and taking with a grain of salt everything you need to do is better than working at a fast pace and committing lots of mistakes. I cling to this outlook for two main reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
First of all, while working slowly, you can learn a bunch of things throughout the process because there is always something additional you need to complete in order to make a great job. Besides, our minds are programmed to learn by experience, so the more accurately you work, the better the experiences you have. To clarify my point, let me take my self as an example, two years ago, I was working in my aunt’s market as her assistant. I did everything my aunt asked me really fastly, but there were some flaws. Later on, my aunt fired me because of my poor job and hired another man. As soon as he arrived, the change was really impressive, every part of the market was extremely clean. So, I decided to ask him how he worked, and he told me that he did it really slowly but being sure that everything was perfect.
Secondly, another important thing about working slowly is that you have time to think and create a mental image of your results. therefore, you will follow some pre-arranged steps in order to get what you want. For instance, my father always says “everybody can do whatever they want but they need to make a plan”. it seems to work because when he was trying to get a job in a pharmaceutic company, he made first an schedule in which he wrote all the things he had to do so as to get the job. In the end, he achieved it. So, I learned to do the same which had been giving me great results in my life.
To sum up, I strongly believe that a slow and precise work is better than a fastly and stupidly one because you are more aware of the things you are doing and because you have the opportunity to learn more things in the process.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: There
there are myriad considerations and factors t...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 130, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Therefore
... create a mental image of your results. therefore, you will follow some pre-arranged step...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 326, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...ant but they need to make a plan'. it seems to work because when he was tryin...
^^
Line 5, column 424, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...n a pharmaceutic company, he made first an schedule in which he wrote all the thin...
^^
Line 5, column 482, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...ch he wrote all the things he had to do so as to get the job. In the end, he achieved it...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, if, look, really, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, as to, for instance, such as, first of all, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 57.0 43.0788530466 132% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 52.1666666667 90% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1728.0 1977.66487455 87% => OK
No of words: 397.0 407.700716846 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.35264483627 4.8611393121 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46372701284 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51580919703 2.67179642975 94% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 212.727598566 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.513853904282 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 549.0 618.680645161 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.7436054573 48.9658058833 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.647058824 100.406767564 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3529411765 20.6045352989 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.76470588235 5.45110844103 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198941978374 0.236089414692 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0621217870658 0.076458572812 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0572827975172 0.0737576698707 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130455074844 0.150856017488 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0355708718231 0.0645574589148 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 11.7677419355 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 58.1214874552 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.25 10.9000537634 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.2 8.01818996416 90% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 86.8835125448 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.