Telling the truth is considered virture in China for thousands years. Even children are constantly told to be honest in speaking after they are able to speak. However, I disagree with the statement that always telling the truth is the most improtant consideration in any relationship between people. I conceive that one has to choose to not tell the truth in certain occasions.
First of all, telling the truth is essential in most circumstances when people interact with each other. Open and straightforward communication nourishs trust between people by exchange accurate and genuine information. On the contrary, a person who frequently tells lies causes repelant from people, which leads to a relationship replete with distrust. For instance, an honest child are always welcomed by neighbors; whereas, a child who tells lies is approached by their skeptical parents. Therefore, one ought to tell the truth in most occasions in order to form a trusted environment for communication. However, people have to tell a white lie in particular circumstances.
Not telling the truth is considered appropriate in specific scenario. For example, deciding to console and encourage a friend after he failed in a test is better than blantly telling him that he is incompetent for it. In certain occations, telling the truth means to distruct a person once more after he just realised his failure. Instead of telling the painful and unsavory truth, one should tell him to forget about this failure, try the test again and prospect a desireable resutl. Thus, choosing not to telling the truth is an act of consideration and wisdom, which is better than telling the truth.
To summarize, I oppose the idea that telling the truth is the fundamental principle in maintain a relationship between people. Even though people should tell the truth in most occasions, not telling the truth is a considerable alternative in particular occasions. People who telling a white lie receive no blame for lying.
- The chart below shows the percentage change in the share of international students among university graduates in different Canadian provinces between 2001 and 2006. 56
- TPO-04 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- Some people think that women should be able to do whatever job they are qualified for including police work while others think that it is wrong to allow women to become police officers What is your opinion 75
- Nowadays many old cities are redesigned and rebuilt in order to look modern Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of this practice 67
- TPO-24 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?One of the best ways that parents can help their teenage children prepare for adult life is to encourage them to take a part-time job.Use specific reasons and examples 88
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, so, therefore, thus, whereas, as to, for example, for instance, in particular, first of all, on the contrary, to tell the truth
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 43.0788530466 39% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1672.0 1977.66487455 85% => OK
No of words: 322.0 407.700716846 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19254658385 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97099645791 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 212.727598566 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.512422360248 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 504.9 618.680645161 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.5801902347 48.9658058833 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.8888888889 100.406767564 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8888888889 20.6045352989 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.16666666667 5.45110844103 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.247238652543 0.236089414692 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0983626383761 0.076458572812 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0965001749741 0.0737576698707 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181591172312 0.150856017488 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0530610849585 0.0645574589148 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 11.7677419355 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 10.9000537634 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 86.8835125448 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.