Today, we see that traffic is problem that needs immediate attention in developing as well as developed countries. Car is the most common automobile owned by every house. By imposing restrictions on cars, we can come to a feasible solution to this problem. Hence, I believe in twenty years there is likely to be fewer cars than today.
Firstly, we have reached a culmination point, and the solution to traffic, pollution and depleting fuels all rely on decreasing the number of cars on the roads. In developing countries like India, which are densely populated, each household owns a car. There aren’t sufficient roads to allow smooth flow of traffic, resulting in time delays. It takes hours to reach a destination which would otherwise have only taken minutes had there been lesser cars. Exasperated people know a little more than to constantly honk a car before theirs, which is also suffering a similar fate. This causes noise pollution. Roads covered with cars are enshrouded by a cloud of smoke released by fuel consuming automobiles. Parking problem is also a rising issue. We have made very efficient engines that consume lesser fuel and give a better millage. New roads are being constantly laid out by the government. Yet, all this has not helped much. Therefore the only alternative left to explore is to control the number of cars. The government is already alarmed and may resort to this, seemingly drastic but promising, measure.
Secondly, technology to use car as a shared resource is underway. There are cars in the pipeline that are self driven. Upon ordering a taxi on an app, one of these cars which is free and nearby will reach you at your pickup point. This makes ownership of the car obsolete. It also addresses the problem of parking spaces. Every car is utilised to for maximum time. There are fewer cars that need to be parked. This technology is already on trial stage and has been successful so far. If implemented in metropolitan cities, we would be seeing lesser cars in twenty years. The inventor can also accommodate features of cab sharing to make this technology more fruitful.
Thus, I believe that we will be seeing fewer cars in near future. The exigent situation calls for drastic measures. Innovative thinking and technology can help us resolve the issue. People will be eager to support the measures taken as they will be economical.
- The following appeared in a memo from the vice president of marketing at Dura-Sock, Inc."A recent study of our customers suggests that our company is wasting the money it spends on its patented Endure manufacturing process, which ensures that our socks ar 58
- Government officials should rely on their own judgment rather than unquestioningly carry out the will of the people whom they serve.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoni 50
- Toward the end of his life, the Chevalier de Seingalt (1725-1798) wrote a long memoir recounting his life and adventures. The Chevalier was a somewhat controversial figure, but since he met many famous people, including kings and writers, his memoir has b 86
- Arctic deer live on islands in Canada's arctic regions. They search for food by moving over ice from island to island during the course of the year. Their habitat is limited to areas warm enough to sustain the plants on which they feed and cold enough, at 66
- People behave differently when they wear different clothes. Do you agree that different clothes influence the way people behave? Use specific examples to support your opinion. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 933, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...ent. Yet, all this has not helped much. Therefore the only alternative left to explore is...
^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'firstly', 'hence', 'if', 'may', 'second', 'secondly', 'so', 'therefore', 'thus', 'well', 'as well as']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.221978021978 0.229887763892 97% => OK
Verbs: 0.202197802198 0.158761421928 127% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0813186813187 0.0866891130778 94% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0593406593407 0.046263068375 128% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0307692307692 0.0685040099705 45% => OK
Prepositions: 0.0879120879121 0.118717715034 74% => OK
Participles: 0.0681318681319 0.0351676179071 194% => Less participles wanted.
Conjunctions: 2.64473294825 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Infinitives: 0.032967032967 0.0309702414327 106% => OK
Particles: 0.0021978021978 0.00188951952338 116% => OK
Determiners: 0.0923076923077 0.0887237588012 104% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.021978021978 0.0209618222197 105% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0175824175824 0.0139019557991 126% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2386.0 2387.08602151 100% => OK
No of words: 403.0 408.028673835 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.9205955335 5.86048508987 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48049772903 4.48200974243 100% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.349875930521 0.338922669872 103% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.263027295285 0.251872472559 104% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.178660049628 0.174417080927 102% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.131513647643 0.112833075102 117% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64473294825 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 231.0 212.727598566 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573200992556 0.524397521467 109% => OK
Word variations: 67.6200314563 59.2087087015 114% => OK
How many sentences: 31.0 20.6684587814 150% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 20.5533526081 63% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.7195353335 48.84282405 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 76.9677419355 120.699889404 64% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.0 20.5533526081 63% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.451612903226 0.644075263715 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.5376344086 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.54480286738 18% => OK
Readability: 39.3027295285 45.7405998639 86% => OK
Elegance: 1.29323308271 1.45489161554 89% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.28858014527 0.300154397459 96% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0282952755885 0.103427244359 27% => Sentence sentence coherence is low.
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0357844157474 0.0752933317313 48% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.344810170254 0.497263757937 69% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.116061239811 0.151897553556 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0823910503573 0.114077575197 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0774297431397 0.0781384742642 99% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.341513352356 0.336927656856 101% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0800998921884 0.067059652881 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.20318075682 0.210909579961 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0304925210099 0.0618886996521 49% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8870967742 109% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.86379928315 155% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 12.0 4.91756272401 244% => Less neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 10.0 8.42114695341 119% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 2.4623655914 122% => OK
Neutral topic words: 7.0 2.75985663082 254% => OK
Total topic words: 20.0 13.6433691756 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.