There are different views on usage of cars in the next twenty years. Some argue that at present cars have many advantages, while others argue that there are many drawbacks to using cars. In my view, I don't agree to the reduction of cars in the next coming years because they are more convenient for traveling, which provides more comfortability for many people and it is more useful to get a thing from outside with less time.
First of all, cars provide easy access to travel any place. For instance, if we have cars they are useful to go far places which are a far distance from our house's like groceries shop, restaurants or even other tourist places which saves time. Furthermore, it provides more convenience to handicapped and old age people. For example, my grandmother who is old was unable to walk she gets leg pain all the time when she walks. So for her, my father bought a car. As a result, people can be more comfortable and can have good journeys over a long distance with less time.
Secondly, it also reduces the cost. For instance, if a family has three kids and if the whole family wants to travel to visit new places, it would be very difficult to spend money on flights because as we know the cost for flights is so expensive. Furthermore, while driving cars they can enjoy watching the scenery and can stop where ever needed and can visit more places rather than going on a flight. Therefore, at present car has become a basic necessity for every individual.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that the cars will not get reduced in the next twenty years because every individual requires cars to travel to far places which provide more happiness.
- TPO-41 - Integrated Writing Task Burning coal in power plants produces a waste product called coal ash, a material that contains small amounts of potentially harmful chemicals Environmentalists in the United States are concerned about the damage such harm 80
- TPO-33 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects.Use spe 60
- TPO-21 - Integrated Writing Task Genetic modification, a process used to change an organism’s genes and hence its characteristics, is now being used to improve trees through genetic modification. It is possible to create trees that produce more fruit, g 85
- TPO-13 - Integrated Writing Task Private collectors have been selling and buying fossils, the petrified remains of ancient organisms, ever since the eighteenth century. In recent years, however, the sale of fossils, particularly of dinosaurs and other lar 81
- TPO-47 - Integrated Writing Task Pterosaurs were an ancient group of winged reptiles that lived alongside the dinosaurs. Many pterosaurs were very large, some as large as a giraffe and with a wingspan of over 12 meters. Paleontologists have long wondered 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 202, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... drawbacks to using cars. In my view, I dont agree to the reduction of cars in the n...
^^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r places which provide more happiness.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, first of all, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 43.0788530466 49% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 52.1666666667 61% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1385.0 1977.66487455 70% => OK
No of words: 298.0 407.700716846 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.64765100671 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43866474056 2.67179642975 91% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 212.727598566 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.560402684564 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 441.9 618.680645161 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.8709237287 48.9658058833 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.9285714286 100.406767564 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2857142857 20.6045352989 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6428571429 5.45110844103 195% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.106956656899 0.236089414692 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0397157078661 0.076458572812 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0314012329232 0.0737576698707 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0779910022128 0.150856017488 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0304313168394 0.0645574589148 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 11.7677419355 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.69 10.9000537634 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.27 8.01818996416 91% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 86.8835125448 56% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.