TPO 1-1Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? At universities and colleges, sports and social activities are just as important as classes and libraries and should receive equal financial support.

It is often observed that various curricular activities are now part of the academic institutions, some argue that these have no importance in future and should not get any funding. I strongly oppose the forth said view, we should provide equal focus on both perspectives.

Firstly, schools and colleges are the places where the whole development of a child takes place, mental as well as physical strong adolescents are the future of a country. Therefore regarding the comprihencial evolution of young generation, there should be more sports and social activities at institutes as well. If the academic institutions only focus on one factor like numbers of classes and libraries, then children will become bored and uninterested towards study due to monotony and consequently perform poorly. Juveniles have to ultimately be the part of the society after their colleges, at that time these specific skills help them to get engage with others smoothly.

On the other hand, from a financial point of view, there are several easy ways to support such recreational activities at any school or college. For instance, many outdoor games can be played without any specific types of equipment and are inexpensive. Also, other activities like running, dancing, blood donation, painting or volunteer for education are some area apart from the actual study which an individual student can choose as a profession for future. According to a survey from the world-famous organization "The Spectrum", around sixty-seven per cent of student perform better in studies if they are involved in some recreational activity as well. This number is huge, hence show the significance of both areas.

To encapsulate, in my opinion, I strongly believe that we should focus on both areas, study as well as sports and other activities in equal manner so that our youngsters could perform better and be prepared for any situation in future.

Votes
Average: 7.6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 173, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...dolescents are the future of a country. Therefore regarding the comprihencial evolution o...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 93, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
...at we should focus on both areas, study as well as sports and other activities in equal ma...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 226, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...etter and be prepared for any situation in future.
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, firstly, hence, if, regarding, so, then, therefore, well, apart from, for instance, as well as, in my opinion, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 43.0788530466 42% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 52.1666666667 75% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1623.0 1977.66487455 82% => OK
No of words: 308.0 407.700716846 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26948051948 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90802356057 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 212.727598566 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.613636363636 0.524837075471 117% => OK
syllable_count: 520.2 618.680645161 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.6003584229 58% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 50.1438901784 48.9658058833 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.25 100.406767564 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6666666667 20.6045352989 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.9166666667 5.45110844103 237% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.14841777738 0.236089414692 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0529259161736 0.076458572812 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0485882854224 0.0737576698707 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0904601604395 0.150856017488 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0204454895874 0.0645574589148 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 11.7677419355 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 58.1214874552 65% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.1575268817 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 10.9000537634 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.49 8.01818996416 118% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 86.8835125448 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.002688172 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.