Nowadays, any one wants to should have a solid scientific background to able to cope with the fierce competition for getting a lucrative job. I disagree with the statement that it is better to have a broad knowledge of many academic subjects than to specialize in one specific subject. I will explore the reasons for my stance in the following lines.
To begin with, with so many competitions and many areas of study it is sound decision to specialize in one field of the science. The more specialized, the less competition and the higher the chances of getting a prestigious job. To be able to climb the ladder of success so quickly, you have to show a unique ability of accomplishing tasks that only very few people are able to do it effectively. For instance, if a company published an advertisement asking for hiring those who have general knowledge of information technology, you will probably find thousands of young people who are will to go for this job. On the other hand, if the same institution wanted to hire a professional in Nano- technology application in the some specific medical area, guess what?!. Your conclusion is right because a very limited number will apply for this job, and your chances to win this prominent job is higher than in the first case.
What is more, if you specialized, you can use your time more effectively, which in turn means that you can study and progress more rapidly in your academic career than if you were distracted with many subjects to study. We have to take into account that many educational institutions has certain requirements that could have no real value in your specialization, in the real world.For instance, I don't understand why some colleges teaches you some courses that really irrelevant to your job. For instance, in some universities in Egypt, you have to study the principles of administration, while your major is physics. Some may argue that any field will need to practice some administration jobs in the future, however, it is unlikely to happen in the short run. Therefore, it is better to focus on the core of this specialization which will help him or her to master his profession. Surely, anyone can study additional courses in the future when needed, but at the beginning of our career, we should be more focused and to the point.
To sum up, I believe that in this modern world, it is be better to concentrate on one field of study. This will give your better chances of polishing your abilities to get better job, or better academic career.
- TPO-49 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends 70
- Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 84
- TPO-24 - Integrated Writing Task Animal fossils usually provide very little opportunity to study the actual animal tissues, because in fossils the animals' living tissues have been largely replaced by minerals. Thus, scientists were very excited recently 70
- TPO-06 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Life today is easier and more comfortable than it was when your grandparents were children.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- TPO-16 - Integrated Writing Task The United Kingdom (sometimes referred to as Britain) has a long and rich history of human settlement. Traces of buildings, tools, and art can be found from periods going back many thousands of years: from the Stone Age, t 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 11, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'anyone'?
Suggestion: anyone
Nowadays, any one wants to should have a solid scientific...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 579, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...probably find thousands of young people who are will to go for this job. On the other h...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 724, Rule ID: THE_SOME_DAY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'same'?
Suggestion: same
... in Nano- technology application in the some specific medical area, guess what?!. Yo...
^^^^
Line 5, column 382, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: For
... your specialization, in the real world.For instance, I dont understand why some co...
^^^
Line 5, column 398, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...tion, in the real world.For instance, I dont understand why some colleges teaches yo...
^^^^
Line 5, column 628, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'argues'.
Suggestion: argues
..., while your major is physics. Some may argue that any field will need to practice so...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 55, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
...elieve that in this modern world, it is be better to concentrate on one field of s...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, really, so, therefore, while, for instance, to begin with, to sum up, what is more, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 49.0 43.0788530466 114% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 52.1666666667 127% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.0752688172 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2092.0 1977.66487455 106% => OK
No of words: 438.0 407.700716846 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77625570776 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57476223824 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83824758994 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 212.727598566 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.504566210046 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 677.7 618.680645161 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.994623655914 101% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 48.4548089678 48.9658058833 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.058823529 100.406767564 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.7647058824 20.6045352989 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.70588235294 5.45110844103 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.5376344086 126% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.279810916439 0.236089414692 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0983924709971 0.076458572812 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.138385741385 0.0737576698707 188% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.199490098623 0.150856017488 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.109614681859 0.0645574589148 170% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 11.7677419355 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 58.1214874552 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.74 10.9000537634 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 86.8835125448 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.