I certainly agree that getting information from many unlike news sources can assist people to be well-informed. Someone can consciously weigh the pros and cons of each side. The explanations go as follows.
Firstly, it is more likely to get new information. These days, human experience a huge advancement in different fields of science and engineering including transportation, communication, health caring, and artificial intelligence. Different news resources usually don’t have a same scope and range, for instance, some of them try to cover electronic progress, while others are interested to mathematics. Taking information from dissimilar resources would be a great opportunity for adults and children to get new experience and keep the pace with new theoretical and practical improvements. This can help individuals to extend their horizon and knowledge.
Furthermore, considering news more deeply is another noticeable reason. Sometimes, different news resources discuss similar social or political events like presidential election. They offer interpretations and solutions for human difficulties and problems. This can be an elegant chance for persons who want to see all hidden points of an occurrence and therefore reach to a profound understanding toward the materials and topics. For example, a university professor can consider Genetic Science from sides of humanity, business, research, and education.
Admittedly, there are some justifications by one who argues that getting data from variety news resources can waste somebody’s time and money. A youngster, for instance, has to pay 10 dollars to purchase Times Newspaper or perhaps spend long hours to surf news websites. This money can be saved for other necessary things such as educational books, or university tuition. However, still I affirm well-informed persons investigate different news resources. Although this would be somehow time and money consuming, it should be neglected compared to the benefits that different news sources have. In additional, any new idea and invention can give countless money and compensate all those mentioned loss.
Due to aforementioned ground, all folk should bear in mind that it is better to get data and information from several unlike news sources. Participation of learning more and considering closely are two prime and conspicuous supports.
- TPO-25 - Integrated Writing Task In 1938 an archaeologist in Iraq acquired a set of clay jars that had been excavated two years earlier by villagers constructing a railroad line. The vessel was about 2,200 years old. Each clay jay contained a copper cylin 83
- TPO-33 - Integrated Writing Task Carved stone balls are a curious type of artifact found at a number of locations in Scotland. They date from the late Neolithic period, around 4,000 years ago. They are round in shape; they were carved from several types o 73
- TPO-46 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The opinions of celebrities, such as famous entertainers and athletes, are more important to younger people than they are to older people.Use specific reasons and exam 70
- TPO-26 - Integrated Writing Task The zebra mussel, a freshwater shellfish native to Eastern Europe, has long been spreading out from its original habitats and has now reached parts of North America. There are reasons to believe that this invasion cannot b 90
- TPO-23 - Integrated Writing Task Populations of the yellow cedar, a species of tree that is common in northwestern North America, have been steadily declining for more than a century now, since about 1880. Scientists have advanced several hypotheses expla 75
Essay evaluation report
flaws:
The reason one is a little bit off the topic. read a sample:
http://www.testbig.com/independent-toefl-writing-essays/tpo-19-independ…
with same ideas.
---------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 21 in 30
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 21 15
No. of Words: 355 350
No. of Characters: 1956 1500
No. of Different Words: 225 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.341 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.51 4.6
Word Length SD: 3.098 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 148 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 120 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 92 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 74 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 16.905 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 7.064 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.381 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.278 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.493 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.038 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Why "The reason one is a
Why "The reason one is a little bit off the topic."
The question talking about any information not only one specific information.
"person must get information from many different news resources."
"In order to be well-informed
"In order to be well-informed, a person must get information from many different news resources." means people can get better understanding for one specific information by different news resources. For example, president election. One newspaper who is supporting one candidate may always say he is good, however, another newspaper may always say he is bad. By read more new sources, we can get well-informed. and finally get our own ideas.
while the topic is not about: people can learn different information by reading different news resources.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... side. The explanations go as follows. Firstly, it is more likely to get new in...
^^^
Line 3, column 662, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... to extend their horizon and knowledge. Furthermore, considering news more deepl...
^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['first', 'firstly', 'furthermore', 'however', 'if', 'so', 'still', 'therefore', 'well', 'while', 'as to', 'for example', 'for instance', 'in addition', 'such as']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.286419753086 0.229887763892 125% => OK
Verbs: 0.143209876543 0.158761421928 90% => OK
Adjectives: 0.113580246914 0.0866891130778 131% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0320987654321 0.046263068375 69% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0197530864198 0.0685040099705 29% => Some pronouns wanted.
Prepositions: 0.083950617284 0.118717715034 71% => OK
Participles: 0.0320987654321 0.0351676179071 91% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.24398101295 2.67179642975 121% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0345679012346 0.0309702414327 112% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00188951952338 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0666666666667 0.0887237588012 75% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0296296296296 0.0209618222197 141% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00740740740741 0.0139019557991 53% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2381.0 2387.08602151 100% => OK
No of words: 354.0 408.028673835 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.72598870056 5.86048508987 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33761313653 4.48200974243 97% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.429378531073 0.338922669872 127% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.353107344633 0.251872472559 140% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.279661016949 0.174417080927 160% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.24011299435 0.112833075102 213% => Too many words length more than 8 chars.
Word Length SD: 3.24398101295 2.67179642975 121% => OK
Unique words: 223.0 212.727598566 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.629943502825 0.524397521467 120% => OK
Word variations: 77.4415601949 59.2087087015 131% => OK
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6684587814 102% => OK
Sentence length: 16.8571428571 20.5533526081 82% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.8344649501 48.84282405 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.380952381 120.699889404 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8571428571 20.5533526081 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.714285714286 0.644075263715 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.5376344086 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.54480286738 36% => OK
Readability: 52.1678773204 45.7405998639 114% => OK
Elegance: 2.06329113924 1.45489161554 142% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.308242412144 0.300154397459 103% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.046569863678 0.103427244359 45% => Sentence sentence coherence is low.
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0342629622447 0.0752933317313 46% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.449088170922 0.497263757937 90% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.131072422357 0.151897553556 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101918526579 0.114077575197 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0598837583993 0.0781384742642 77% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.269887008243 0.336927656856 80% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0624855266622 0.067059652881 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.198758459685 0.210909579961 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0328373977896 0.0618886996521 53% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8870967742 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.86379928315 129% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.91756272401 122% => OK
Positive topic words: 10.0 8.42114695341 119% => OK
Negative topic words: 4.0 2.4623655914 162% => OK
Neutral topic words: 4.0 2.75985663082 145% => OK
Total topic words: 18.0 13.6433691756 132% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.