A glance at countless forms of media in modern world brings to light a problem that has several times provoked discussions, that is, whether it is necessary for people to refer to many new resources to be well-informed. Some might contend that using too many news resources is a waste time. However, I would like to suggest getting information from different resources keeps us with speed, convenience and objectivity.
First and foremost, different platforms have different advantages in terms of news-telling. With the advent of technology, people now have multiple ways to get information, and they are actually playing distinct roles in today's life. Radio, for example, can be useful for drivers, bringing the latest news to its users when they can not spare time to read or watch. TV programs, as a main source of entertainment, show vivid pictures of the ongoing events in any part of the globe. Newspapers, a source should not be ignored as well, carries huge amount of information, telling news stories with remarkable details as well as background and commentaries. These resources combined depicts a lively and real world to us.
Secondly, it is widely acknowledged that people's minds are shaped by what they read and see on a daily basis. Since at present many news reports are biased intentionally, it is advisable for people to go through various news source for objectivity. If they only receive information from a single source, they are highly likely to be misled by a particular ideology, which would absolutely narrow their vision and let them percept some wrong or even radical thoughts. Conversely, if people have the chance to read about one story from different or even contradicting perspectives, they will be get closer to truth and form their own judgements.
Finally, an additional argument comes to mind is that as the increasingly connected world has rendered it a extremely difficult task for a single news source to cover all the news. For instance, local news media only concentrate on the events around the city, while an economic magazine is specialized in financial news. Therefore, were people to get sufficient amount of information, it would be far from enough to use one source, and looking at it different new resources naturally becomes an essential.
Due to aforementioned ground, it is worthwhile for people for to pay attention to different news resources.
- TPO-46 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The opinions of celebrities, such as famous entertainers and athletes, are more important to younger people than they are to older people.Use specific reasons and exam 83
- TPO-17 - Integrated Writing Task In the past century, the steady growth of the human population and the corresponding increase in agriculture and pesticide use have caused much harm to wildlife in the United States,birds in particular. Unfortunately for b 86
- TPO-18 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Students are more influenced by their teachers than by their friends. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 66
- TPO-42 - Independent Writing Task Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 90
- TPO-34 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Educating children is a more difficult task today than it was in the past because they spend so much time on cell phone, online games, and social networking Web site.U 97
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 107, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...asingly connected world has rendered it a extremely difficult task for a single n...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, conversely, finally, first, however, if, look, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, while, for example, for instance, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 43.0788530466 60% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2018.0 1977.66487455 102% => OK
No of words: 394.0 407.700716846 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12182741117 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45527027702 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95971300194 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 212.727598566 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578680203046 0.524837075471 110% => OK
syllable_count: 627.3 618.680645161 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.8441360692 48.9658058833 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.705882353 100.406767564 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1764705882 20.6045352989 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.23529411765 5.45110844103 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189663548779 0.236089414692 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0635559225298 0.076458572812 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0370808780006 0.0737576698707 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113382299815 0.150856017488 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0283175736794 0.0645574589148 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 11.7677419355 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 58.1214874552 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 10.9000537634 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 86.8835125448 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.