TPO 21 Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement For success in a future job the ability to relate well to people is more important than studying hard in school Use specific reasons and examples to support your ans

Some people claims that for success in future job, the ability to relate well to people is not as important as studying hard in school because they believe that it is important to gain skills and knowledge from the schools for success in a future job. However, in my opinion, I believe that, the ability to relate well to people is more important than studying hard in school for the following three reasons.
First of all, it is very important for students to have the experience to work in a group project for their future job. In a group project you can only do well when you can understand other's mindset and their capabilities. Only then they can bring out their best product. In job market people do not work alone. They have to work in a group and it is important for them to relate to their colleagues so that they can combine creative mindsets to to do something innovative. For example, If someone is working in a group project and he does not know what his group members are capable of than they might end up in something bad because of this communication gap.
Second of all, the most important thing in work is to present the work properly. If you cannot present to your employer what you have done he might think that you are not doing well. For example, if an employee does not provide regular proper updates of his work to his manager, the manager might not give him enough credit for his task even though he has been working perfectly. However, if you have great communication skill then you can easily convince your manager with your work and presentation skill.
Finally, to be success in future job one must have the ability to lead or manage a group of people. people with skill of leading and managing other have more chances to be promoted than others with more skill. On the other hand, people who work hard but lacks to communicate with others have less chance to be promoted as manager or leader.
In conclusion, for success in a future job it is definitely important to have skills and knowledge but the ability to relate to people is more important to me for these above reasons.

Votes
Average: 7 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 443, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: to
...that they can combine creative mindsets to to do something innovative. For example, I...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 81, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...n work is to present the work properly. If you cannot present to your employer wha...
^^
Line 4, column 100, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: People
...ty to lead or manage a group of people. people with skill of leading and managing othe...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, if, second, so, then, well, for example, in conclusion, first of all, in my opinion, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 42.0 43.0788530466 97% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1730.0 1977.66487455 87% => OK
No of words: 382.0 407.700716846 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.52879581152 4.8611393121 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42095241839 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39079629213 2.67179642975 89% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 212.727598566 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.424083769634 0.524837075471 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 543.6 618.680645161 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.4001378675 48.9658058833 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.125 100.406767564 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.875 20.6045352989 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.25 5.45110844103 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.3320375057 0.236089414692 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127018392919 0.076458572812 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.099551494582 0.0737576698707 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.216667015831 0.150856017488 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.113021016131 0.0645574589148 175% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 11.7677419355 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 58.1214874552 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.29 10.9000537634 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.89 8.01818996416 86% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 86.8835125448 59% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.002688172 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200

Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.