Teachers in the classroom have a powerful effect on their students in every field. Students spend a lot of time with their teacher and might be their model in life. So, while some people encourage teachers to share everything with their students including their social and political perspectives, I oppose this concept. I feel this way for two main reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
First of all, students in the age of school phase have not developed the skills of critical thinking yet. Therefore, if they heard their teachers' opinion about complicated issues like politics, They would mimic their attitude without full understandings. In contrary, I would encourage teachers to motivate pupils to discuss this material in order to have their own viewpoint. That would be the most beneficial thing to do. For example, my cousin told me that he spent a great time with his history teacher when he was in high school. His teacher guided and trained them to have various opinions on different historical events in the past and compared them to events that related to our contemporary time. That helped my cousin to have a significant opinion in such subjects because he had learned the skills of analyzing issues, in addition, he learned the critical thinking.
Secondly, teachers have a limited time to teach and deliver the requirements of information. However, the social and political events consume a lot of time to discuss during the class. These subjects could raise a debate that takes a long time to end. Furthermore, these events are renewable all the time. That means there would be always plenty of matters to talk about. So, I guess teachers should not share their opinions in such circumstances because it would affect the essential subjects that students have to learn.
To sum up, I strongly believe that teachers should not discuss their social or political opinions with their pupils. Because students would imitate these views without full comprehension. In addition, these kinds of subjects would consume a lot of students' time during their regular academic classes.
- TPO-45 - Integrated Writing Task Any student of paleontology will be struck by the fact that a great many animals of the past were considerably larger than they are today. This holds true for species ranging from dinosaurs to most mammals. Just why they w 3
- TPO-40 - Independent Writing Task Some parent offer their school-age children money for each high grade (mark) they get in school Do you think this is a good idea?Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- TPO-43 - Independent Writing Task Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?-Interrupt and correct the mistake right away-Wa 66
- TPO-14 - Integrated Writing Task Every year, forest fires and severe stormscause a great deal of damage to forests in the northwestern United States. One way of dealing with the aftermath of these disasters is called salvage logging, which is the practice 75
- TPO-21 - Integrated Writing Task Genetic modification, a process used to change an organism’s genes and hence its characteristics, is now being used to improve trees through genetic modification. It is possible to create trees that produce more fruit, g 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 118, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...r political opinions with their pupils. Because students would imitate these views with...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for example, i feel, i guess, in addition, first of all, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 15.1003584229 33% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 43.0788530466 111% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1769.0 1977.66487455 89% => OK
No of words: 347.0 407.700716846 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09798270893 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31600926901 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.643356736 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 212.727598566 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.512968299712 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 536.4 618.680645161 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.2110198732 48.9658058833 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.45 100.406767564 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.35 20.6045352989 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.95 5.45110844103 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181886620928 0.236089414692 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0632323174581 0.076458572812 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0590872356688 0.0737576698707 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136798395287 0.150856017488 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0617283885498 0.0645574589148 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 11.7677419355 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.0 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.89 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 86.8835125448 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.