Throughout history, human beings have changed a lot and lots of variation in lifestyle have had made great influence on their choices. Making decision is one of the most influential part of people's lives, particularly the decisions made for society and whole community. In this regard, an important question arises which is are people in their societies involved with important decisions for their future? As a matter of fact, I think people play an important role in the society but not in all aspects. In what follows, I will explore my double-side point of view to elaborate this issue.
First off, nowadays people have got stock in developed lifestyle which more societies have the right to choose and determine for their own future through voting. Societies which are ruled by democratic pattern are more likely to have this opportunity to use people’s opinion and ways of thinking. If people agree upon something, the government will follow their stances. For instance, in my country, we choose our president through a system of voting and in this way we can trust the opted president to improve our society. An established survey in the journal of political events indicates that the most prosperous countries are those where people are free to choose and have role in their country. As one of the greatest political characters in my country once said:" The government is in the hands of people and they should be responsible for their future".
On the contrast, there are some aspects that people should not take part in since they do not have enough knowledge about them. If some unskillful people want to manage and make decision, the country and whole community will face difficult problems. For instance, ordinary people not only cannot understand some of economic or social issues, but also if they are involved to fix them or make decision, they will make the condition worse. I was watching a document about social problems in one of the African countries. Never did I see such a problem before. Some mayors who were not informed enough about problematic issues in society wanted to control the situation but they made bigger problems such as poverty and famine.
To put it briefly, contemplating both sides, one soon realizes that people in some events should take part whereas their choices and contributions in some cases not only is not needed but also if they participate, they will make society to face bigger rigors. Thus, people should know this fact that they have to be aware of what happening around them and attend some social activities that their presence are needed with having an eye to this fact that in some other cases their decisions are not required.
- TPO 43- Agnostids were a group of marine animals that became extinct about 450 million years ago. Agnostid fossils can be found in rocks in many areas around the world. From the fossil remains, we know that agnostids were primitive arthropods-relatives of 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Sometimes it is better not to tell the truth. Use specific reasons and details to support your answer. 70
- Some people prefer to live in the country Others prefer to live in the town or big cities Which do you prefer Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion 69
- TPO 18-2 83
- TPO 41Question: Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they change the specific arguments presented in the reading passage. making sever rules for recycling of coal ash. 80
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, briefly, but, first, if, may, so, thus, whereas, for instance, i think, such as, as a matter of fact, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 43.0788530466 107% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 52.1666666667 117% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2259.0 1977.66487455 114% => OK
No of words: 454.0 407.700716846 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97577092511 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61598047577 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59855235368 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 226.0 212.727598566 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.497797356828 0.524837075471 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 713.7 618.680645161 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.890213626 48.9658058833 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.894736842 100.406767564 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8947368421 20.6045352989 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.36842105263 5.45110844103 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160701853187 0.236089414692 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0581619780314 0.076458572812 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0473337635037 0.0737576698707 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106009000377 0.150856017488 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0506828167753 0.0645574589148 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 11.7677419355 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 58.1214874552 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 10.9000537634 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 86.8835125448 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.