When it comes to project assignments, most students prefer working alone since their team member may have zero contribution and it seems best for them to work on their own. On the other hand, working with other students actually have much more benefits; thus, co-working outweighs working alone in project assignments.
To begin with, communication skills are significantly required in team work. People have relatively different thoughts and see things through hardly identical ways due to being raised in different families. Thus, communication is exceptionally important while working in the same team for achieving goals. Besides, communication skills are not innate, it is necessary to learn via continuous trials. Through working in the same project, students are able to accumulate skills of communication, which also are crucial in future careers. In my Web Programming course, for instance, our professor asked us to design a website by co-working. He divided the whole class into several groups, each of which contains equal number of engineering students and design-majored students. This division resembles the current working environments where people come from different departments and are manage to work together harmoniously. At first, our team members who came from design department designed a fancy website, which in programming perspective is not possible to design within a tight schedule. Nevertheless, through every discussion and concession, our website was finally in shape before deadline.
Moreover, working with others does have the possibilities to see things in totally different ways. People have different thoughts and have their advantages and drawbacks. Thus, we could learn the way other people think through cooperation. The previous example of my Web Programming class could also help to illustrate this point. Design-majored team members only saw the website in a fancy and superficial way, whereas the engineer-majored students saw it in a more practical point of view. Through discussion, design-majored students learned the practical perspectives of seeing the same thing, and vice versa. Hence, team work benefited us.
Accordingly, teachers believe that cooperating with others is a more effective approach for students’ learning when they assign projects, since they can learn communication skills and different viewpoints.
- To be an effective leader, a public official must maintain the highest ethical and moral standards.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In 50
- TPO-40 - Independent Writing Task Some parent offer their school-age children money for each high grade (mark) they get in school Do you think this is a good idea?Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- TPO-33 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects.Use spe 73
- TPO-47 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is important to know about events happening around the world, even if it is unlikely that they will affect your daily life. 73
- TPO-40 - Integrated Writing Task Many scientists believe it would be possible to maintain a permanent human presence on Mars or the Moon. On the other hand, conditions on Venus are so extreme and inhospitable that maintaining a human presence there would 86
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 885, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'managed'.
Suggestion: managed
...come from different departments and are manage to work together harmoniously. At first...
^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['accordingly', 'actually', 'also', 'besides', 'but', 'finally', 'first', 'hence', 'if', 'may', 'moreover', 'nevertheless', 'so', 'thus', 'whereas', 'while', 'for instance', 'to begin with', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.261194029851 0.229887763892 114% => OK
Verbs: 0.154228855721 0.158761421928 97% => OK
Adjectives: 0.109452736318 0.0866891130778 126% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0597014925373 0.046263068375 129% => OK
Pronouns: 0.047263681592 0.0685040099705 69% => OK
Prepositions: 0.114427860697 0.118717715034 96% => OK
Participles: 0.0373134328358 0.0351676179071 106% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.1275422166 2.67179642975 117% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0273631840796 0.0309702414327 88% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00188951952338 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0547263681592 0.0887237588012 62% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00995024875622 0.0209618222197 47% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0174129353234 0.0139019557991 125% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2373.0 2387.08602151 99% => OK
No of words: 354.0 408.028673835 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.70338983051 5.86048508987 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33761313653 4.48200974243 97% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.440677966102 0.338922669872 130% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.350282485876 0.251872472559 139% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.257062146893 0.174417080927 147% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.19209039548 0.112833075102 170% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1275422166 2.67179642975 117% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 212.727598566 94% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567796610169 0.524397521467 108% => OK
Word variations: 63.7538189338 59.2087087015 108% => OK
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6684587814 97% => OK
Sentence length: 17.7 20.5533526081 86% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.7486227318 48.84282405 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.65 120.699889404 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7 20.5533526081 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.95 0.644075263715 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.5376344086 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.54480286738 18% => OK
Readability: 52.7282485876 45.7405998639 115% => OK
Elegance: 1.58095238095 1.45489161554 109% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238077759092 0.300154397459 79% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0909863680346 0.103427244359 88% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.075710379241 0.0752933317313 101% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.446698994492 0.497263757937 90% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.190203946858 0.151897553556 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.080157132655 0.114077575197 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0523867448164 0.0781384742642 67% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.250785399915 0.336927656856 74% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.138957918076 0.067059652881 207% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170134359902 0.210909579961 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0261601916325 0.0618886996521 42% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8870967742 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.86379928315 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 12.0 4.91756272401 244% => Less neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 8.0 8.42114695341 95% => OK
Negative topic words: 0.0 2.4623655914 0% => More negative topic words wanted.
Neutral topic words: 8.0 2.75985663082 290% => OK
Total topic words: 16.0 13.6433691756 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.