There are certain considerations everyone can take into accout to investigate and examine the students' learning efficiency in group or alone. While someone contends that it is more effective for students to learn alone, I asserts group work will absolutely promotes their efficiency, for not only it provides opportunity for cooperation and communication between students, but also creates an atmosphere of proper competition.
First and foremost, no one can deny the fact that every individuals have their own advantages in terms of skills and talents, and cooperation makes sure everyone can make the most contribution to the work. When working together, every member in a team can be responsible for the part they are best at, making their work more effective. If a student deals with a project by himself, he will spend lots of time learning something he doesn't know before, which is a waste of time.
Furthermore, communication is another noticeable factor, for it stimuluses team members' inspiration, helping them to come up with the best solution together. For example, brainstorm is a quite powerful strategy used by many organizations. Group members will gather together to talk about their thoughts on their work freely, during which many innovative solutions that promote the project are likely to occur. It is the exchanges of ideas among different people that matters most in brainstorm, which is impossible if one work alone.
Finally, an additional support come to my mind is competition among group members, which stimulates students' efficiency greatly. In a group, everyone wants to make more contribution to the team, and the pressure can be converted to motivation to drive them work harder. But a noticeable point is that there must be a reasonable evaluation system designed by the teacher. If the teacher solely focus on the performance of the group as whole without paying attention to each members' contribution to the job, it is likely that no one want to work hard for the team.
For the aforementioned ground, I firmly believe for students, work in a group is definitely more effective than work on their own.
- TPO-32 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Because the world is changing so quickly, people now are less happy or less satisfied with their lives than people were in the pastUse specific reasons and examples to 83
- TPO-21 - Integrated Writing Task Genetic modification, a process used to change an organism’s genes and hence its characteristics, is now being used to improve trees through genetic modification. It is possible to create trees that produce more fruit, g 73
- TPO-09 - Integrated Writing Task Car manufacturers and governments have been eagerly seeking a replacement for the automobile's main source of power, the internal-combustion engine. By far the most promising alternative source of energy for cars is the hy 73
- Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed. 83
- According to a recent report,cheating among college and university students is on rise . however Groveton college has successfully reduced cheating by adopting an honor code , which calls for students to agree not to cheat in their academic endeavors and 54
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 223, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[1]
Message: The pronoun 'I' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'assert'
Suggestion: assert
...ffective for students to learn alone, I asserts group work will absolutely promotes the...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 258, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'promote'
Suggestion: promote
...e, I asserts group work will absolutely promotes their efficiency, for not only it provi...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 432, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...pend lots of time learning something he doesnt know before, which is a waste of time. ...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 81, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'members'' or 'member's'?
Suggestion: members'; member's
...ticeable factor, for it stimuluses team members inspiration, helping them to come up wi...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 474, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'members'' or 'member's'?
Suggestion: members'; member's
... whole without paying attention to each members contribution to the job, it is likely t...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, furthermore, if, so, while, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 43.0788530466 60% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 52.1666666667 90% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.0752688172 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1800.0 1977.66487455 91% => OK
No of words: 348.0 407.700716846 85% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1724137931 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31911543099 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94706008855 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 212.727598566 92% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560344827586 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 571.5 618.680645161 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.994623655914 101% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.4199318041 48.9658058833 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.571428571 100.406767564 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8571428571 20.6045352989 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.71428571429 5.45110844103 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208371478445 0.236089414692 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0752079991773 0.076458572812 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0451279471774 0.0737576698707 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125165305451 0.150856017488 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0286170612668 0.0645574589148 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 11.7677419355 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 58.1214874552 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 10.9000537634 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 86.8835125448 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 21.0 10.002688172 210% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.