There are certain considerations or factors that everyone should take into account to investigate and examine the efficiency of working on assignments in groups. While someone contends that it is more effective for students to perform group tasks, I assert that students learn more by working alone on projects, and it is absolutely more skillful. I notably believe that working solely is a more effective way to reveal a better overall result. Someone can consciously weigh the pros and cons of each side. The explanations will be explored in the following essay.
First and foremost, no one can deny the fact that students who work in groups on a certain project enhance the possibility of another student to become lazy and irresponsible. This partner rely a critical amount of work and responsibility on other members, thus unbalancing the distribution of tasks. This is definitely unfair to the other group members. Because of that, some students would be extremely devastated by the increase in the probability of getting an overall low grade at the end. For example, a team in a biology class where it consists of various members. If one of the students possessed a lower IQ ormysteriously decides that he is not going to finalize perfectly his duties, the overall score would be dramatically affected. All the students here are vigorously taken down to drown in the deep ocean of failure.
Furthermore, another noticeable factor is that students sharing tasks tend to waste their time on matters other than the project. Students lose their focus on finding good and productive ideas to improve their work, and otherwise focus on different random and useless activities. For example, when students chat about various subjects and personal issues, they stop focusing on the assigned project and the time will fly by dangerously. While reaching the due date to submit their work, group members will not be fully ready, thus resulting in an extremely unprofessional grade. In spite of the fact that all of the members used to get an excellent score when working individually.
Admittedly, there are some justifications by one who argues that group assignments raise dramatically the level of communication and understanding between group members. Students share ideas, information and suggestions to benefit the whole group in order to achieve the score that they really deserve. However, still I affirm that group work does not lead to a more effective learning than working alone. In fact, group work projects cause a reduction in the information and skills that are expected to be learned. Dividing the tasks that group members are supposed to finish reduce the amount of work done by each individual. Students would not be aware of what other students did, thus a lack in skills learned is a great issue.
Due to aforementioned ground, all folks should bear in mind that working in groups on a project may lead to a reduction in the final result. This is unfair to some students and would harm the process of learning. That is why I prefer to working alone and individualizing the project to reflect the uniqueness of various personalities rather than losing the identity of the project.
- TPO-43 - Independent Writing Task Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?-Interrupt and correct the mistake right away-Wa 60
- TPO 33:Agree/Disagree:When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, students will learn much more effectively than ask them to do alone. 80
- TPO-05 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?People today spend too much time on personal enjoyment-doing things they like to do-rather than doing things they should do.Use specific reasons and examples to suppo 90
- TPO-24 - Integrated Writing Task Animal fossils usually provide very little opportunity to study the actual animal tissues, because in fossils the animals' living tissues have been largely replaced by minerals. Thus, scientists were very excited recently 81
- TPO-15 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In order to become financially responsible adults, children should learn to manage their own money at young age. Use specific reasons and examples to support your ans 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 190, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'relies'.
Suggestion: relies
...me lazy and irresponsible. This partner rely a critical amount of work and responsib...
^^^^
Line 5, column 606, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...sional grade. In spite of the fact that all of the members used to get an excellent score ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 238, Rule ID: PREFER_TO_VBG[1]
Message: Did you mean 'work'?
Suggestion: work
...ss of learning. That is why I prefer to working alone and individualizing the project t...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, however, if, may, really, so, still, thus, while, as to, for example, in fact, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 21.0 11.0286738351 190% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 72.0 52.1666666667 138% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2682.0 1977.66487455 136% => OK
No of words: 528.0 407.700716846 130% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07954545455 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.79356345386 4.48103885553 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87324026873 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 260.0 212.727598566 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.492424242424 0.524837075471 94% => OK
syllable_count: 840.6 618.680645161 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.994623655914 101% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.6003584229 126% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.6715038122 48.9658058833 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.153846154 100.406767564 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3076923077 20.6045352989 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.42307692308 5.45110844103 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.85842293907 259% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.287183774358 0.236089414692 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0789705814415 0.076458572812 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0595496045498 0.0737576698707 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173011152139 0.150856017488 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.038754744942 0.0645574589148 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 11.7677419355 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 124.0 86.8835125448 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.