In the modern society, there’s no doubt that team working has become one of the most important skills for both children and adults. Whether students should work alone or together has been an issue of public interest and concern. Personally, I totally approve the point that working together can make students learn more effectively for the following reasons.
To begin with, they can fully communicate with each other by working together. More specifically, through communication, it supplies an excellent chance of expression their opinions and learning the advantages of others For example, when I was in a summer school and required to make a presentation about culture. Not working alone, I chose to work in a team with four students who came from different countries. With a whole day’s communication, I got a better knowledge of other countries culture so that the presentation contained not only the culture of my country but also the culture of others. It is undeniable that people can open their horizon by working together.
Moreover, working together reduces time effectively. Let’s think about if you have to work alone, you have to waste lots of time on preparation and the decision of how to work. On the contrary, by working together, you just need to care about your own tasks that it is a really effective way to save time. According to a research by the Peking University in 2016, the efficiency of working together is two times more than working alone in most situations. What’s more, when working together, you can ask any question to your partners who have to ability to offer reasonable suggestions. Comparing with no one’s help, it saves much time for no need of thinking it many days. In fact, communication is the best way to overcome a difficulty in a short time.
Admittedly, sometimes working alone is also necessary such as studying math problems and final projects. In fact, these conditions are limit, especially in the modern society even the physicists have to work in a large group. No one can success without others.
Due to aforementioned reasons, it’s easy to draw a conclusion that working together is more effectively than working alone for better communication and saving more time.
- TPO-44 - Independent Writing Task Some people believe that when busy parents do not have a lot of time to spend with their children, the best use of that time is to have fun playing games or sports. Others believe that it is best to use that time doing th 60
- TPO-44 - Integrated Writing Task In 1957 a European silver coin dating to the eleventh century was discovered at a Native American archaeological site in the state of Maine in the United States. Many people believed the coin had been originally brought to 61
- TPO-42 - Independent Writing Task Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- TPO-48 - Integrated Writing Task In recent years, many frog species around the world have declined in numbers or even gone extinct due to changes in their environment. These population declines and extinctions have serious consequences for the ecosystems 81
- TPO-16 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The best way to travel is in a group led by a tour guide. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 325, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'research'.
Suggestion: research
...ffective way to save time. According to a research by the Peking University in 2016, the e...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 771, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... overcome a difficulty in a short time. Admittedly, sometimes working alone is a...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, really, so, for example, in fact, no doubt, such as, on the contrary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 43.0788530466 60% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 52.1666666667 121% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1896.0 1977.66487455 96% => OK
No of words: 371.0 407.700716846 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11051212938 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38877662729 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92105200375 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 212.727598566 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547169811321 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 601.2 618.680645161 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Interrogative: 2.0 0.994623655914 201% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.2063895389 48.9658058833 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.7894736842 100.406767564 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5263157895 20.6045352989 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.68421052632 5.45110844103 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.300101016859 0.236089414692 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0985136993937 0.076458572812 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.061756613378 0.0737576698707 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169064210514 0.150856017488 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0414830585022 0.0645574589148 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 10.9000537634 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 86.8835125448 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.