There are certain considerations and factors that everyone can take into account to examine or investigate people’s opinion. I defiantly believe that when students work together on projects they can learn more sufficiently than when they do it lonely. Someone can consciously weigh the pros and cons of each side. To substantiate my case, the following paragraphs represent conspicuous reasons to elaborate my preference.
Firstly, youngsters usually tend to ask their questions from their friends easier. In fact, they are much more comfortable with their same ages. Therefore, they can solve their problems by asking from their friends in group of study. For instance, when one person in a group is professional in math, he can teach his friends problems better than their mentor. Because he knows his friends issues better than his teacher. In other words, he spends lots of time with their friend. Consequently, he recognizes their problems in details.
Furthermore, psychological fact is another noticeable reason. Many psychological surveys show that group working can raise children self-confidence. Nowadays self-confidence is a very important feature in every part of our lives. For example, in many jobs such as a real stat agent, shy person cannot do well. This job need to be a confidential and social one. Doing assignment not only raises children self-confidence, but also it improves their personality features such as sociality.
Finally, lonely working can cause many problems such as depression and anxiety. Besides, In order to be a successful person in a society, individuals should be in a healthy mood. So, juveniles must stay away from these kind of mental diseases. Admittedly, if students do their projects with each other, it may increase their positive energy. In modern life, people live with lots of stress and depression. Hence, when they are with their friends it decrease their stress and help them to stay in a good mood and health.
To sum up, all folks should bear in mind that students can learch much more effectively by doing their projects in a group. Participation of solving problems easier, raising self-confidence and healthy life are my prime supports.
- TPO-27 - Integrated Writing Task The little ice age was a period of unusually cold temperature in many parts of the world that lasted from about the year 1350 until 1900CE. There were unusually harsh winters, and glaciers grew larger in many areas. Scient 94
- TPO-49 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends 70
- tpo48 3
- TOEFL T P O 31 Integrated Writing Task 90
- TPO-20 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Successful people try new things and take risks rather than only doing what they know how to do well. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 88
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 360, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ends problems better than their mentor. Because he knows his friends issues better than...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 213, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'these kinds'?
Suggestion: this kind; these kinds
...mood. So, juveniles must stay away from these kind of mental diseases. Admittedly, if stud...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 449, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'decreases'?
Suggestion: decreases
...ce, when they are with their friends it decrease their stress and help them to stay in a...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, consequently, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, if, may, so, therefore, well, for example, for instance, in fact, kind of, such as, in other words, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 42.0 43.0788530466 97% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 52.1666666667 84% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1856.0 1977.66487455 94% => OK
No of words: 352.0 407.700716846 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27272727273 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33147354134 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98813403141 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 212.727598566 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605113636364 0.524837075471 115% => OK
syllable_count: 550.8 618.680645161 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.1344086022 70% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.7012373243 48.9658058833 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 74.24 100.406767564 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.08 20.6045352989 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.52 5.45110844103 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189759779827 0.236089414692 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0515378137351 0.076458572812 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0758914714038 0.0737576698707 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112848389601 0.150856017488 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.050858924238 0.0645574589148 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 11.7677419355 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 10.1575268817 87% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.69 10.9000537634 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 86.8835125448 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.0537634409 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.