Teachers use different kinds of assigments to analyze the knowledge of students in the lessons. Working in a group is another concern in education systems which is very important. Hence, combination of these two topics will have great results if happens in an appropriate time. I think that teachers should assign different projects to the students based on the level of studying. In my opinion, graduate students must do the projects together and undergraduate students should do the projects alone. I have some reasons for my opinion which I will mention in the reminder of this essay.
Undergraduate students should do their projects alone to elaborate their understanding about lessons. Undergraduate students are young and gathering them together will not have good academic outcomes. Because they always gather for having fun and entertaining each other. I have similar experience from one of my lessons while I was a bachelor student. Our teacher assigned some projects to students and categorized them into different groups including three students. My friend and I had to assemble an electronic device for transmitting light. We missed all deadlines and finally our project earned least score. Because, we were playing computer games when we met each other.
Graduate student should have group projects to learn how to deal with other people. Graduate projects are complex and challenging. It is impossible for everyone to handle complex projects without helping of their classmates and co-workers. Working in a group will help graduate studentsw in their future working enviroment. Because they have to deal with other people in a group to overcome complexity of big projects. For example, I had to simulate one of the most famous papers when I was studying for my master degree. It was also impossible to do this project without helping of my classmate. So, we divided the paper into two part and each one simulated his part. Finally, we combined two parts and our project became best project in class.
In a conclusion, It is important to classify projects based on their complexity into group projects or alone projects. I n my opinion, graduate students should work on a group projects and undergraduate student should work on alone projects to increase their knowledge in the field of study.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mention in the reminder of this essay. Undergraduate students should do their p...
^^
Line 2, column 616, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...finally our project earned least score. Because, we were playing computer games when we...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...computer games when we met each other. Graduate student should have group proje...
^^
Line 3, column 326, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...tsw in their future working enviroment. Because they have to deal with other people in ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 718, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'became the best'.
Suggestion: became the best
..., we combined two parts and our project became best project in class. In a conclusion, I...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... project became best project in class. In a conclusion, It is important to clas...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, hence, if, so, while, for example, i think, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 42.0 43.0788530466 97% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1935.0 1977.66487455 98% => OK
No of words: 375.0 407.700716846 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40055868397 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8048643461 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 212.727598566 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.496 0.524837075471 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 594.9 618.680645161 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.2432341077 48.9658058833 50% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 77.4 100.406767564 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.0 20.6045352989 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.88 5.45110844103 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.23450576823 0.236089414692 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0718146892024 0.076458572812 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0560969250768 0.0737576698707 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169497517461 0.150856017488 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0301364064849 0.0645574589148 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 11.7677419355 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.06 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 86.8835125448 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 63.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.