There is no gainsaying that the great majority teachers have agreement that assingment like projects, have a crucial role in students' educaiton. However, there are controversial debates about this question whether students should work together for donig these project or alone. From my perspective, student shoule be aske to do these assignment with team working. Ensuing paragraphs will elaborate my points of view.
The first exquisite point to be mentioned is that students who work together for doing projects, are more efficeint. To put in apposite words, the member of groups are able to divide the project to some specific section and each member is assinged for doing the specifc section. Thus, the memebrs are able to ponder over this secton profoundly and learn better. After that, each student share his/her knowledge with other member of the group and they learn new things. For example, once my macroecomics proffesor assing one article to each five students as a group. Our article was a long article, so each one of us just concentrate on some pages and then we talked to each other about the each section and whole of the article. We learnt plenty things and we could to present the article more efficent. Therefore, students are capable to do theri projects more efficent when they work thogether.
Another conspiucous of working together for doing projects is that some student who are more intelligent than others, are capable to help other group members. In better words, each student has talent in specific field and he/she is able to help others in that field and he/she can ask help for other fields that she has problems. For example, I has problem with microceonomics materials in uiversity while I was great in macroeconomics materials. As a result, I found one of my classmate who was skilled in microeconmics materials and he help me to have a better proformance in microeconomics field.
Last but not least, students are capable learn new things like responsiblity, social ineraction, team working etc when they work togher for doing a project. There is no doubt that these features are very useful for students specially in their working places.
In conclusion, contemplating all aforementioned paragraphs, there is no doubt that the advantages doing projects as groups outweigh its disadvantages for students.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 329, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this assignment' or 'these assignments'?
Suggestion: this assignment; these assignments
...rspective, student shoule be aske to do these assignment with team working. Ensuing paragraphs w...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s will elaborate my points of view. The first exquisite point to be mentione...
^^
Line 3, column 357, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to better', 'to well'
Suggestion: to better; to well
...r over this secton profoundly and learn better. After that, each student share his/her...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... efficent when they work thogether. Another conspiucous of working together ...
^^
Line 5, column 348, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[1]
Message: The pronoun 'I' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'have'
Suggestion: have
...s that she has problems. For example, I has problem with microceonomics materials i...
^^^
Line 5, column 541, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'helps'.
Suggestion: helps
...illed in microeconmics materials and he help me to have a better proformance in micr...
^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r proformance in microeconomics field. Last but not least, students are capab...
^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... specially in their working places. In conclusion, contemplating all aforeme...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, so, then, therefore, thus, while, for example, in conclusion, no doubt, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 43.0788530466 93% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1974.0 1977.66487455 100% => OK
No of words: 383.0 407.700716846 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15404699739 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42384287591 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79827843412 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.522193211488 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 595.8 618.680645161 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.2136337233 48.9658058833 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.894736842 100.406767564 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1578947368 20.6045352989 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.68421052632 5.45110844103 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.5376344086 144% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252799130797 0.236089414692 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0875102609227 0.076458572812 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0731020799561 0.0737576698707 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146462258286 0.150856017488 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0621610514251 0.0645574589148 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 10.9000537634 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 86.8835125448 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.