Nowadays, due to the burgeoning of the cities, the thirst to hasten the transportation time is growing too. I disagree with the notion of having less cars in the near future. I feel this way for two reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
To begin with, it’s important to consider the rapid increase of the population. As a result, more vehicles are required to move piles of people from one place to another one. Even if we assume that they will use public transportation for all of their affairs, still, more cars are needed. My personal experience is a compelling example of this. I am from a small town in the east of Iran. about 20 years ago, there was just one main street in the city and the majority of houses were constructed near it. In that time, a single bus line that circulated around the city was sufficient to connect the essential parts together and provide a promising service for the citizens. But now, we have scores of crowded paths in various locations of the town which mean a great deal of public services would be necessary to ease and pace the travels.
In addition, reduction in the cost of automobiles, will make them more popular. Everyday, The industry is introduced with new methods to facilitate the fabrication processes. Consequently, more products are made in a shorter time with less humans in the manufacturing loop. These can cause a drastic decrease in the costs and will make the outcomes more affordable. For instance, about 20 years ago, cars were luxury materials that not everyone was able to buy. Little by little, factories replaced machines with manpower, so that lead to the existence of numerous cars in the market with lower prices. Therefore more people became eager to have one for their own. The proliferation of vehicles can be observed by comparing the number of cars in the streets in 10 years ago and now. This pattern can be extended to infer the anticipation of seeing even more in the future.
In conclusion, I’m of the opinion that more cars will be perceived in 20 years later. This is because the demands by rising habitants of the cities should be satisfied with more public services and cheaper automobiles in the market can persuade more people to purchase one.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 146, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun cars is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...o. I disagree with the notion of having less cars in the near future. I feel this wa...
^^^^
Line 3, column 224, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n if we assume that they will use public transportation for all of their affairs,...
^^
Line 3, column 396, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: About
... from a small town in the east of Iran. about 20 years ago, there was just one main s...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 81, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: Every day
...tomobiles, will make them more popular. Everyday, The industry is introduced with new me...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 236, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun humans is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...roducts are made in a shorter time with less humans in the manufacturing loop. These...
^^^^
Line 5, column 604, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...s cars in the market with lower prices. Therefore more people became eager to have one fo...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, if, so, still, therefore, for instance, i feel, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 43.0788530466 53% => OK
Preposition: 68.0 52.1666666667 130% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1872.0 1977.66487455 95% => OK
No of words: 392.0 407.700716846 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77551020408 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44960558625 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6637490764 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 212.727598566 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548469387755 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 600.3 618.680645161 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.8778057042 48.9658058833 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.0909090909 100.406767564 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8181818182 20.6045352989 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 5.45110844103 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.88709677419 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.145949074892 0.236089414692 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0443690186219 0.076458572812 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0382836251678 0.0737576698707 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0982485483641 0.150856017488 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.017689734096 0.0645574589148 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 11.7677419355 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.15 10.9000537634 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 86.8835125448 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.