Not surprisingly, education has long been the cornerstone of every society. Due to its importance, people harbor different perception for inspiring their children to be successful in their educational terms. The discussion has centered on that whether parents should consider any financial reward for each grade of their children or not. While I tend to refute such a view, I believe it can not be applicable for students from all walks of life.
The first point to support such a view is that financial rewarding might impair children's mindset about the essence of education. From a morality point of view, it is clearly perceived that no matter how small or insignificant the amount of money is, it can cause negative connotation. In fact, it seems that parents offer a bribe to their children for what they have to be done as a responsibility. Needless to say, children might bring up with a wrong understanding of their duties. In a real world, no one would be rewarded for what she/he should be done.
Moreover, paying children for having good grades is not regarded as a long remedy for provoking students' motivations. It should be noted that if any student is not eager to continue his/her education, paying money can not tackle this problem. In fact, if this concept is explained to them that why a student should try hard or otherwise, what the consequence of casual studying can be, there is a little doubt that it can be more efficient. In fact, compelling children to be successful and offering them financial praise might not pave the way for exalting them to achieve what their parents established for them as goals.
Despite these facts, it has been argued that paying them money could be brought some redeeming features like making them prepare for future job labor or pushing them to stand on their own feet as they become more self-reliance. However, it is noteworthy to say that there have been some other strategies to fulfill the parents' intention. In fact, some nonfinancial reward like planning outdoor games or one-day trip are better alternatives for encouraging students to do their best efforts for accomplishing their school assignments.
From what has been discussed, the demerits of children's offering money outnumber its merits in numbers of ways. As it was mentioned, not only can it be misinterpreted the students 'understanding of their first responsibility as a leaner but also it might not address the lack of students' eagerness. Nonetheless, other non-financial drivers can act as a motivation without any negative mentioned aftermaths.
- TPO-23 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In today’s world, it is more important to work quickly and risk making mistakes than to work slowly and make sure that everything is correct.Use specific reasons an 80
- A folk remedy for insomnia, the scent in lavender flowers, has now been proved effective. In a recent study, 30 volunteers with chronic insomnia slept each night for three weeks on lavender-scented pillows in a controlled room where their sleep was monito 66
- TPO-24 - Integrated Writing Task Animal fossils usually provide very little opportunity to study the actual animal tissues, because in fossils the animals' living tissues have been largely replaced by minerals. Thus, scientists were very excited recently 80
- TPO-28 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Parents today are more involved in their children’s education than were parents in the past.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 75
- TPO-17 - Integrated Writing Task In the past century, the steady growth of the human population and the corresponding increase in agriculture and pesticide use have caused much harm to wildlife in the United States,birds in particular. Unfortunately for b 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 320, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'parents'' or 'parent's'?
Suggestion: parents'; parent's
...en some other strategies to fulfill the parents intention. In fact, some nonfinancial r...
^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'moreover', 'nonetheless', 'so', 'while', 'in fact']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.212446351931 0.229887763892 92% => OK
Verbs: 0.188841201717 0.158761421928 119% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0793991416309 0.0866891130778 92% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0429184549356 0.046263068375 93% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0729613733906 0.0685040099705 107% => OK
Prepositions: 0.130901287554 0.118717715034 110% => OK
Participles: 0.0729613733906 0.0351676179071 207% => Less participles wanted.
Conjunctions: 2.92405241798 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0321888412017 0.0309702414327 104% => OK
Particles: 0.00214592274678 0.00188951952338 114% => OK
Determiners: 0.0815450643777 0.0887237588012 92% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0364806866953 0.0209618222197 174% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0150214592275 0.0139019557991 108% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2584.0 2387.08602151 108% => OK
No of words: 427.0 408.028673835 105% => OK
Chars per words: 6.05152224824 5.86048508987 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54576487731 4.48200974243 101% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.348946135831 0.338922669872 103% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.266978922717 0.251872472559 106% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.201405152225 0.174417080927 115% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.131147540984 0.112833075102 116% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92405241798 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 225.0 212.727598566 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.526932084309 0.524397521467 100% => OK
Word variations: 60.236227597 59.2087087015 102% => OK
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6684587814 92% => OK
Sentence length: 22.4736842105 20.5533526081 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.7859453456 48.84282405 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.0 120.699889404 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4736842105 20.5533526081 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.526315789474 0.644075263715 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.5376344086 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.54480286738 18% => OK
Readability: 49.1715764822 45.7405998639 108% => OK
Elegance: 1.3661971831 1.45489161554 94% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179640692644 0.300154397459 60% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.11211484612 0.103427244359 108% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.08334329955 0.0752933317313 111% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.503310318045 0.497263757937 101% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.106392819579 0.151897553556 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0719812477203 0.114077575197 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.047670612902 0.0781384742642 61% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.30036933884 0.336927656856 89% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.10616729036 0.067059652881 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117820296356 0.210909579961 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0488436169888 0.0618886996521 79% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8870967742 109% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.86379928315 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.91756272401 41% => OK
Positive topic words: 11.0 8.42114695341 131% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 2.4623655914 122% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 2.75985663082 72% => OK
Total topic words: 16.0 13.6433691756 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.