The communal approach towards each occupation has evolved in the recent ages and teachers are not an exception. However, some jobs earned more positive manner while others like teachers received less recognition and in some way people's appreciation have declined in recent years. I believe this transformation came from the increase in the number of teachers and a universal attitude that dismisses teachers role.
The increase in availability of a resource will make it less valuable among those who need it. This general rule applies to many resources in our world. Consider Gold as an example which people respect it the most among other precious materials and silver or bronze receive less attention. Similarly, teachers have become more available in recent years and as a result, people do not pay desired attention to them and dismissed their positive effects on society. However, a century ago the situation was different, people respected them more because it was hard to found a teacher at that time. The number of parents who sent their children to other countries bolsters the fact that how parents in the society had respected education and teachers in the previous century.
Since teachers do their job quietly and effectively, fewer individuals pay attention to their valuable contribution to the public. If one day they stop doing their job, people would acknowledge how they sacrifice their time and sometimes health to train our youths. As an example a few years ago, some teachers avoid teaching because of low wage and then the parents and government was starting to notice what would happen if they continue to hold their rally, there will be a devastating consequence on the education system that leads to unemployment and lack of workforce.
Overall, people have accustomed to the teacher's services and their contribution to the society and as a result, they have become unwary of their role in society. This will suggest that people should be reminded that teachers effort have to be recognized because they contribute a lot to a society.
- Do you agree or disagree with following statement? Parents today are more involved in their children's education than were parents in the past. 60
- TPO-40 - Independent Writing Task Some parent offer their school-age children money for each high grade (mark) they get in school Do you think this is a good idea?Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- Tpo 44Some people believe that when busy parents do not have a lot of time to spend with their children, the best use of that time is to have fun playing games or sports. Other believe that it is best to use that time doing things together that are relate 60
- In 1938 an archaeologist in Iraq acquired a set of clay jars that had been excavated two years earlier by villagers constructing a railroad line. The vessel was about 2,200 years old. Each clay jay contained a copper cylinder. 3
- Nowadays, parents don't have the time to play with their children anymore. What activity should they ask the children to do during the period: have fun playing games/sports, or spend time with schoolwork? 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 217, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'teachers'' or 'teacher's'?
Suggestion: teachers'; teacher's
...est that people should be reminded that teachers effort have to be recognized because th...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, similarly, so, then, while, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 15.1003584229 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 52.1666666667 73% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.0752688172 198% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1738.0 1977.66487455 88% => OK
No of words: 337.0 407.700716846 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15727002967 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28457229495 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73346763469 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 212.727598566 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.551928783383 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 546.3 618.680645161 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.94265232975 20% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.1935778257 48.9658058833 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.142857143 100.406767564 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0714285714 20.6045352989 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.07142857143 5.45110844103 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.119889483561 0.236089414692 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0446695125239 0.076458572812 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0222952800841 0.0737576698707 30% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0789281974187 0.150856017488 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00534634702913 0.0645574589148 8% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 11.7677419355 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 58.1214874552 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 10.9000537634 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 86.8835125448 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.