Admittedly, the teachers have played a critical role in every human's life. Due to their importance, people harbor different perception of teachers' appreciation compared to the last decades. The discussion has centered on that the contemporary teachers do not receive enough attention from society compared to the past. While I believe it can not be generalized to all cases, I tend to agree on such a view based on the following reasons.
The first point to support such a trend is through the advent of the internet, the didactic environment has drastically changed. Firstly, there has been more than one approach for any pupil to be well-educated. In past, most students were required to attend the traditional classes to be involved in training courses. However, nowadays this concept has changed through different technological breakthroughs. As an example, the online courses or telecommunication devices which facilitated other methods of a didactic environment, have crossed the traditional border of the schools and any educational institutions. Not surprisingly, the teachers are not regarded as the sole resource for obtaining knowledge. Consequently, not only students but also society do not exalt the teacher's importance.
Moreover, the process of being a professional teacher has undergone a considerable amount of changes. In the past, not only lack of top-notch educational materials but also the way of people' lifestyle hindered more children to pursue their education. According to the anecdotal experience, most children's priority was likely to support their families in financial terms. Not surprisingly, a small amount of family allowed their youngsters to be well educated for their future career. Hence, if any individuals became a teacher, most people in his surroundings might appreciate him/her as an elite. However, in today's society, there is a growing opportunity for students to be a unique instructor in his/her own interests. In general, any situation which seems to be available for an excessive amount of people is not be rewarding.
From what have been discussed, it should be noted that the significance of teacher impairs compared to last generations. As it was mentioned, not only the educational environment but also the availability of becoming an instructor are likely to be the main justification of such a trend. However, if authority allocates some benefits only for faculty or professors, they might be appreciated or valued by any human beings.
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones. 58
- TPO-29 - Integrated Writing Task Large numbers of dinosaur fossils have been discovered in deposits on Alaska's North Slope, a region that today experiences an extremely cold,arctic climate. One hundred million years ago, when those dinosaurs were alive, 80
- TPO2 Independent Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Always telling the truth is the most important consideration in any relationship between people 92
- It is more important for students to understand ideas and concepts than it is for them to learn facts. 76
- The function of science is to reassure; the purpose of art is to upset. Therein lies the value of each. 75
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 63, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'humans'' or 'human's'?
Suggestion: humans'; human's
...rs have played a critical role in every humans life. Due to their importance, people h...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 212, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'In the past'?
Suggestion: In the past
...oach for any pupil to be well-educated. In past, most students were required to attend ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 776, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'teachers'' or 'teacher's'?
Suggestion: teachers'; teacher's
...dents but also society do not exalt the teachers importance. Moreover, the process o...
^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'consequently', 'first', 'firstly', 'hence', 'however', 'if', 'moreover', 'so', 'well', 'while', 'in general']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.221198156682 0.229887763892 96% => OK
Verbs: 0.175115207373 0.158761421928 110% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0990783410138 0.0866891130778 114% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0645161290323 0.046263068375 139% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0299539170507 0.0685040099705 44% => OK
Prepositions: 0.10599078341 0.118717715034 89% => OK
Participles: 0.0668202764977 0.0351676179071 190% => Less participles wanted.
Conjunctions: 3.2190920733 2.67179642975 120% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0391705069124 0.0309702414327 126% => OK
Particles: 0.00230414746544 0.00188951952338 122% => OK
Determiners: 0.112903225806 0.0887237588012 127% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00921658986175 0.0209618222197 44% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00691244239631 0.0139019557991 50% => Some subClauses wanted starting by 'Which, Who, What, Whom, Whose.....'
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2502.0 2387.08602151 105% => OK
No of words: 389.0 408.028673835 95% => OK
Chars per words: 6.43187660668 5.86048508987 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44106776838 4.48200974243 99% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.429305912596 0.338922669872 127% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.352185089974 0.251872472559 140% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.282776349614 0.174417080927 162% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.174807197943 0.112833075102 155% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.2190920733 2.67179642975 120% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 212.727598566 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552699228792 0.524397521467 105% => OK
Word variations: 62.91411384 59.2087087015 106% => OK
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6684587814 102% => OK
Sentence length: 18.5238095238 20.5533526081 90% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.2612751298 48.84282405 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.142857143 120.699889404 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5238095238 20.5533526081 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.619047619048 0.644075263715 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.5376344086 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.54480286738 54% => OK
Readability: 53.7423185212 45.7405998639 117% => OK
Elegance: 1.46153846154 1.45489161554 100% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.275348394096 0.300154397459 92% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0948666976512 0.103427244359 92% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0643774843372 0.0752933317313 86% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.467820797914 0.497263757937 94% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.127366619164 0.151897553556 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0986778455689 0.114077575197 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0514265234788 0.0781384742642 66% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.395057476879 0.336927656856 117% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0462121966163 0.067059652881 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.193826966501 0.210909579961 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0546065506218 0.0618886996521 88% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8870967742 109% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.86379928315 26% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.91756272401 142% => OK
Positive topic words: 11.0 8.42114695341 131% => OK
Negative topic words: 1.0 2.4623655914 41% => OK
Neutral topic words: 7.0 2.75985663082 254% => OK
Total topic words: 19.0 13.6433691756 139% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.