TPO-41 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

Submitted by Zahratd on Mon, 10/08/2018 - 06:41

By and large, it is established beyond doubts that teachers have an impressive role in every society and it is of vital importance to be appreciated and valued. In this regard, many individuals hold the view that they were more admired by society in the past. However, there are others opinion that they are more cherished nowadays. I am personally inclined to believe that the former approach pales in comparison to the latter one. In the following paragraphs, a couple of cogent reasons have been elaborated in order to elucidate some obscure points in this framework.
The first pivotal point which exhorted me to opt for this point of view is that many pieces of research have been done recently which consider the difficulties of teaching. Based on these researches, teachers must be so patient because it takes time for students to learn something and by considering the point that everybody is not as intelligent as another one for learning immediately, it must be energy-taking for teachers. Some similar results in parallel studies help us to understand how the teachers are vital classes in every society for flourishing the knowledge of its children. The result of these research are presented to society and by that, not only are people aware of the situation of this job, but also convince them to be more appreciated to the teachers. By way of illustration, in my country, lots of books and television shows are prepared to imply the indispensable role of the teachers and now it is crystal clear that they must be cherished more.

The other equally compelling reason in corroborating my stance is the effect of new methods for teaching that helps teachers to be more popular. Nowadays, these methods are changed vastly. They are more practical and creative which not only motivate students but also impel them to use their knowledge in real life. In comparison to the old tough methods that limited students, the new ones are more appealing. Due to the point that students are more satisfied nowadays, this satisfaction spread to society. As a result, the more satisfaction from the teachers, the more appreciated they are. By way of illustration, In my nephew's school, relation to nature and using smartphones are using by teachers. They help the students to learn from nature and connect to modern life, either. His teacher takes them to the near forest to teach them biology, weekly. using these methods has brought more popularity for her that everyone loves and valued her. this example clarifies how using new methods is resulted to appreciate teachers more.

By perusing the above paragraphs, one can infer that although the teachers have been appreciated all the time, they are more admired nowadays. All the aforementioned reasons point my idea. However, an important issue that must be mentioned is that this cannot be used as a prescription for everybody and some counterexamples might exist. As a result, I suggest conducting more surveys and studies to answer this question more precisely.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Independent TOEFL Writing
Essays by the user:
>>> more essays by the user >>>

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 857, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Using
...r forest to teach them biology, weekly. using these methods has brought more populari...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 949, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...her that everyone loves and valued her. this example clarifies how using new methods...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, so, as a result, by and large

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 33.0 15.1003584229 219% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.0286738351 163% => OK
Pronoun: 56.0 43.0788530466 130% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 67.0 52.1666666667 128% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2523.0 1977.66487455 128% => OK
No of words: 502.0 407.700716846 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02589641434 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.7334296765 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80614794306 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 238.0 212.727598566 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.474103585657 0.524837075471 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 806.4 618.680645161 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 8.0 3.08781362007 259% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.0281551764 48.9658058833 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.92 100.406767564 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.08 20.6045352989 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.4 5.45110844103 44% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183394599426 0.236089414692 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0610021324761 0.076458572812 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0450550754575 0.0737576698707 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12667077436 0.150856017488 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0350506158172 0.0645574589148 54% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 10.9000537634 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 124.0 86.8835125448 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.