When it comes to correcting other people's mistakes, people in general only correct them within their minds instead of telling their ideas to them. Relatively few people correct them immediately by interrupting. As for me, the best and appropriate way is to wait until they are available to listen to my opinions.
Clearly, it is rude to interrupt while people are delivering a speech, or during a meeting.
Certainly, audience may harbor considerable questions in their minds during meetings or classes. Although teachers are always willing to discuss with their students, it is still not polite to discontinue class. The timing of discussing with professor is crucial. As a result, a feasible approach is to discuss in the Q&A sections, or after the class or meeting. My English professor is a great example for this circumstance. She was a new professor in our department, which means she had quite few teaching experiences. My classmate, Judy, is a hardworking student who always preview before attending every class, and she always asks numerous questions during every class. Some of her questions are critical whereas some are shallow. Professor's teaching schedule was delayed significantly due to those questions, and it does have harmful impacts to other students. Professor taught our class much less compared to her other class. Even though we could study on our own, the professor’s teaching style helped us learn English more efficiently. Therefore, it is somehow unequal for other students.
Moreover, it is proper to prepare before asking a question. Whenever I conceive a question related to class or meeting which I attend to, I always write down those questions. Then after the class or meeting, I re-think my question and do some research for related materials in order to figure out possible explanations on my own, or to verify my doubts. This is meaningful to me before asking the teacher or the meeting leader since there is a great chance that I misunderstand their meaning, or I had incorrect or insufficient knowledge. After all, teachers and meeting leaders are much more familiar with the topic they are discussed. Thus, I will organize my doubts and acquire background knowledge before discussion for improving the quality of discussion.
Accordingly, I prefer to wait until the class or meeting is over and the teacher or the meeting leader is finally free for discussing about their controversial opinions, rather than correct the mistake right away through interruption, or say nothing about their incorrectness.
- TPO-40 - Integrated Writing Task Many scientists believe it would be possible to maintain a permanent human presence on Mars or the Moon. On the other hand, conditions on Venus are so extreme and inhospitable that maintaining a human presence there would 86
- TPO-34 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Educating children is a more difficult task today than it was in the past because they spend so much time on cell phone, online games, and social networking Web site.U 60
- People today are too individualistic. Instead of pursuing self-centered, separate goals, people need to understand that satisfaction comes from working for the greater good of the family, the Community or society as a whole. 50
- To be an effective leader, a public official must maintain the highest ethical and moral standards.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In 50
- TPO-41 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 71
Discourse Markers used:
['accordingly', 'finally', 'if', 'may', 'moreover', 'so', 'still', 'then', 'therefore', 'thus', 'whereas', 'while', 'after all', 'as for', 'as to', 'in general', 'as a result']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.206451612903 0.229887763892 90% => OK
Verbs: 0.163440860215 0.158761421928 103% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0795698924731 0.0866891130778 92% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0602150537634 0.046263068375 130% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0967741935484 0.0685040099705 141% => Less pronouns wanted. Try not to use 'you, I, they, he...' as the subject of a sentence
Prepositions: 0.101075268817 0.118717715034 85% => OK
Participles: 0.0365591397849 0.0351676179071 104% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.94606714636 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0408602150538 0.0309702414327 132% => OK
Particles: 0.00430107526882 0.00188951952338 228% => OK
Determiners: 0.0731182795699 0.0887237588012 82% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00645161290323 0.0209618222197 31% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.010752688172 0.0139019557991 77% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2548.0 2387.08602151 107% => OK
No of words: 411.0 408.028673835 101% => OK
Chars per words: 6.199513382 5.86048508987 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50256981431 4.48200974243 100% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.411192214112 0.338922669872 121% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.318734793187 0.251872472559 127% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.21897810219 0.174417080927 126% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.143552311436 0.112833075102 127% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94606714636 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 227.0 212.727598566 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552311435523 0.524397521467 105% => OK
Word variations: 63.981039464 59.2087087015 108% => OK
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6684587814 111% => OK
Sentence length: 17.8695652174 20.5533526081 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.5133913619 48.84282405 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.782608696 120.699889404 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8695652174 20.5533526081 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.739130434783 0.644075263715 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.5376344086 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.54480286738 0% => OK
Readability: 49.7430445361 45.7405998639 109% => OK
Elegance: 1.07382550336 1.45489161554 74% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.412054780513 0.300154397459 137% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0894453615829 0.103427244359 86% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0600079346084 0.0752933317313 80% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.436848347553 0.497263757937 88% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.21518063014 0.151897553556 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124930730081 0.114077575197 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.116625282746 0.0781384742642 149% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.285851956105 0.336927656856 85% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0944147673139 0.067059652881 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.26543885533 0.210909579961 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.109246176842 0.0618886996521 177% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8870967742 50% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.86379928315 207% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.91756272401 183% => Less neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 2.0 8.42114695341 24% => More positive topic words wanted.
Negative topic words: 4.0 2.4623655914 162% => OK
Neutral topic words: 7.0 2.75985663082 254% => OK
Total topic words: 13.0 13.6433691756 95% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.