There are a lot of circumstances that we should be wise to handle them politely and correctly. One of these situations is when a teacher, for instance, says an inaccurate information. In my opinion, in this case, we should not mention this mistake directly and postpone the comments until the teacher finishes his speech. I feel this way for two main reasons, which I will illustrate in the following essay.
First of all, teachers and meeting leaders could be feeling stressful during their speaking already, thus, interrupting them to edit what unintentional error would increase their stress. So the right behavior is to ask for a clarification after they finish their presentation.
Secondly, waiting for a person in charge to introduce his whole idea is a wise thinking, because there might hidden data that they would not reveal on it until the end of the speech. So if someone interrupts the speaker that may interfere with their proposal.
To sum up, I strongly believe that we should not interrupt any speaker during his presentation if he says something untrue, but we should ask about it at the end of the speech privately, otherwise, that would make them fell stress and nervous. In addition, we should wait until the end of the meeting to guarantee that we process the whole idea and nothing was
- TPO-44 - Independent Writing Task Some people believe that when busy parents do not have a lot of time to spend with their children, the best use of that time is to have fun playing games or sports. Others believe that it is best to use that time doing th 70
- TPO-19 - Integrated Writing Task Many consumers ignore commercial advertisements. In response, advertising companies have started using a new tactic, called “buzzing." The advertisers hire people,buzzers,who personally promote (buzz) products to people 65
- TPO-30 - Integrated Writing Task A little over 2,200 years ago, the Roman navy attacked the Greek port city of Syracuse. According to some ancient historians, the Greeks defended themselves with an ingenious weapon called a "burning mirror": a polished co 71
- TPO-26 - Integrated Writing Task The zebra mussel, a freshwater shellfish native to Eastern Europe, has long been spreading out from its original habitats and has now reached parts of North America. There are reasons to believe that this invasion cannot b 73
- TPO-29 - Integrated Writing Task Large numbers of dinosaur fossils have been discovered in deposits on Alaska's North Slope, a region that today experiences an extremely cold,arctic climate. One hundred million years ago, when those dinosaurs were alive, 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 110, Rule ID: PRP_PAST_PART[2]
Message: Did you mean 'have hidden' or 'hide'?
Suggestion: have hidden; hide
...is a wise thinking, because there might hidden data that they would not reveal on it u...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 184, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[3]
Message: “So if” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...veal on it until the end of the speech. So if someone interrupts the speaker that may...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 360, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e process the whole idea and nothing was
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, may, second, secondly, so, thus, for instance, i feel, in addition, first of all, in my opinion, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 15.1003584229 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 35.0 43.0788530466 81% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 52.1666666667 54% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1091.0 1977.66487455 55% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 223.0 407.700716846 55% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89237668161 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86434787811 4.48103885553 86% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7409926451 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 212.727598566 64% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.614349775785 0.524837075471 117% => OK
syllable_count: 327.6 618.680645161 53% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 20.6003584229 49% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.4176000958 48.9658058833 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.1 100.406767564 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3 20.6045352989 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.2 5.45110844103 224% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 11.8709677419 25% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.103610472081 0.236089414692 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0406868302748 0.076458572812 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0262283684025 0.0737576698707 36% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0595564533205 0.150856017488 39% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0284652516212 0.0645574589148 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 11.7677419355 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 10.9000537634 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 86.8835125448 56% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.