Throughout history, human beings have some times made mistakes in their life. Similarly, teachers and lecturers make some mistakes during their teachings. In this regard, there is a controversy among people how to react toward teachers' mistakes. There are different approches such as forgeting about the mistake, correcting the mistake imidiatelt, and rectifying the mistake after the session. I believe that the third approach is the best way to correct an erroneous statement and I will elaborate on my viewpoint in the subsequent paragraphs.
To begin with, intrupting the teacher is a disruptive behavior. Teachers probably lose their concentration when they are intrupted and they may be not able to continue their speach. Thus, the session can be impractical due to the teacher distraction .In addition, other students in the class may be distracted by this disruptive behavior and they may not be able to focus on their lesson as well. Take a personal experience as an example: last semester I had a class in which a student asked lots of questions and intrupted our teacher. Trying to answer the so-called student's questions, our teacher had difficalties to get back to the main topic of the session, and this phenomenon maked the class efficiency to decline dramatically. Regarding this example, people should avoid interupting others.
Secondly, as we all know, it is inevitable not to make some mistakes. No one can claim thate he or she never makes mistake. It is not embaressing to make mistakes, but it is substantial to try to avoid repeating mistakes. Given that teachers are human beings, they may say some wrong statement in their class. Thus, students should tell them their mistakes so that they can be aware of that and don not repeat their mistake in other classes. But, students should respect their teachers and try not to hurt their teacher's reputation. Therefore, the best way to tell the teachers their mistakes is saying after class. In this way, Teachers understand their mistakes and they can maintain their reputation as well.
All in all, taking into account what was already mentioned, I believe that telling teachers their mistakes after class not only makes them be aware of their faults, but also helps them maintan their reputation.
- Plain of jars TPO 59 73
- TOEFL T P O 43 Integrated Writing Task 3
- Should the government sell Amtrak and let a private company run it instead The answer is no First losing money due to underused routes people who complain about this fail to understand that the main purpose of Amtrak is not to make a profit but to provide 81
- Teachers were more appreciated and valued by the society in the past than today 76
- Spartacus the rebel leader who fought against the Romans with an army of fellow escaped slaves is one of the most famous figures in ancient Roman history Spartacus led his men against their Roman oppressors and managed to defeat the Roman army in several 75
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 249, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...practical due to the teacher distraction .In addition, other students in the class...
^^
Line 2, column 251, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
...actical due to the teacher distraction .In addition, other students in the class m...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, regarding, second, secondly, similarly, so, therefore, third, thus, well, as for, in addition, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 48.0 43.0788530466 111% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 52.1666666667 84% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1900.0 1977.66487455 96% => OK
No of words: 373.0 407.700716846 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09383378016 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39467950092 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7343242267 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 212.727598566 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.520107238606 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 569.7 618.680645161 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.3086689943 48.9658058833 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.0 100.406767564 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.65 20.6045352989 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.85 5.45110844103 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 14.0 3.85842293907 363% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0940848510981 0.236089414692 40% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0390138812153 0.076458572812 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.03220261904 0.0737576698707 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0665848230438 0.150856017488 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0308144141585 0.0645574589148 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 11.7677419355 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 86.8835125448 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.