The reading exposes some facts about the Pterosaurs, a dinosaur with wings, that by the reading is not capable to fly due several reasons. However the professor cast doubt the thre main facts.
First, the reading states that pterosaurs were cold blood animals like the reptiles we see today. This kind off animals can't produce enough energy that is required to fly. It's a reflect of its low metabolism. To contradicts, the lecturer says that the metabolism of this dinosours were diferente from the usual reptales.
Second, according to the reading the pterosaur were to large and heavy to fly. For instance, their bones were bigger than a giraffe. On the other hand, the professor explain that they have fit bodies light enough that enable them to fly.
Third, the reading especifies that in order to take off the ground these ancient animals should have powerfull muscles in their back lags. Moreover they shold be able to run and jump. Unlikely the fossil are evidence that they don't posses the large and strong muscles required. On the contrary, the lecturer mentions that these dinosours were capable to run in they four lags. So they were fast enough to jump and get off the ground.
- TPO-32 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Young people today have no influence on the important decisions that determine the future of society as a whole.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answe 76
- TPO-32 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Young people today have no influence on the important decisions that determine the future of society as a whole.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answe 76
- TPO-48 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Because modern life is very complex, it is essential for young people to have the ability to plan and organize. 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In the past, young people depended too much on their parents to make decisions for them; today young people are better able to make decisions about their own lives.Use specific reasons and examples to 60
- TPO-48 - Integrated Writing Task In recent years, many frog species around the world have declined in numbers or even gone extinct due to changes in their environment. These population declines and extinctions have serious consequences for the ecosystems 68
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 103, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r with wings, that by the reading is not capable to fly due several reasons. Howe...
^^
Line 1, column 141, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...ot capable to fly due several reasons. However the professor cast doubt the thre main ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 121, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...les we see today. This kind off animals cant produce enough energy that is required ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 173, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: It's; It is
... enough energy that is required to fly. Its a reflect of its low metabolism. To con...
^^^
Line 3, column 177, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ugh energy that is required to fly. Its a reflect of its low metabolism. To contradicts, ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 140, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
...e powerfull muscles in their back lags. Moreover they shold be able to run and jump. Unl...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 228, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ikely the fossil are evidence that they dont posses the large and strong muscles req...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, moreover, second, so, third, for instance, in fact, kind of, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 9.8082437276 10% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 13.8261648746 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 43.0788530466 56% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 52.1666666667 50% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 994.0 1977.66487455 50% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 204.0 407.700716846 50% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87254901961 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77926670891 4.48103885553 84% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.27617839404 2.67179642975 85% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 212.727598566 57% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.598039215686 0.524837075471 114% => OK
syllable_count: 297.9 618.680645161 48% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 14.0 20.1344086022 70% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.9400746296 48.9658058833 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 71.0 100.406767564 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.5714285714 20.6045352989 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.21428571429 5.45110844103 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.5376344086 126% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0505818590676 0.236089414692 21% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0175815774423 0.076458572812 23% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0220753145753 0.0737576698707 30% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.029119058013 0.150856017488 19% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0221617428804 0.0645574589148 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.8 11.7677419355 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 58.1214874552 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.1575268817 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.37 10.9000537634 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.66 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 86.8835125448 49% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.0537634409 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.