It has been a controversial issue whether young people today have impact on the vital decisions that determine the future of society. As for me, I argue that youngsters nowadays indeed have influence on the big decisions determining the future of society, and my reasons are as follows.
First and foremost, determining decisions for a society's future depends on many celebrities, and now many younger generations are opinion leaders in society. For example, a 25-year-old youtuber in Taiwan called Ray Du always expresses his political opinions on the internet, and many people admire his unique viewpoints. Last month, our president Tsu even visited him in person to discuss some educational issues with him. Evidently, young people today do have strong influence on a society's future.
In addition, crucial decisions for a society's future will be tremendously influenced by protests and rallies, and young people today often protest in order to make some laws changed. For instance, three years ago, there was a political movement in Taiwan held by college students called Sunflower movement, because they did not agree with the new educational policy published by the government. Students rallied in front of the city hall, and protested for revising the unreasonable law. The movements eventually made our government rehash the law and even invited the student lead of the movement to have further discussions. Apparently, the young today do have huge impact regarding the essential decision for a country's future.
Last but not least, significant decisions for a country's future will be affected by the internet, and nowadays young people are good at making use of the internet to control opinions. To further elaborate, governments today like to browse the internet to understand citizens' comments and make changes accordingly, and young people can spread many reviews to impact both older people and governments. For instance, in my country, many people will post their political thoughts on the biggest forum named PTT. Young people would generate a lot of accounts to make their viewpoints more solid and compelling. As a result, our government will take their idea into consideration.
To conclude, young people nowadays do play an important role in the decision making process for a society's future. After all, many intelligent young people are opinion leaders, they held rallies to express their thought, and they are master at manipulating opinions on the internet.
- TPO28-Parents today are more involved in their children's education than parents were in the past 70
- The following appeared in a memo from a vice president of Quiot Manufacturing."During the past year, Quiot Manufacturing had 30 percent more on-the-job accidents than at the nearby Panoply Industries plant, where the work shifts are one hour shorter than 59
- Integrated Writing TPO32 80
- tpo28 71
- 27. In any field of inquiry, the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you tak 54
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 252, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nments today like to browse the internet to understand citizens comments and make...
^^
Line 7, column 569, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...generate a lot of accounts to make their viewpoints more solid and compelling. As...
^^
Line 10, column 284, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... manipulating opinions on the internet.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, apparently, but, first, if, regarding, so, after all, as for, for example, for instance, in addition, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 11.0286738351 18% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 43.0788530466 49% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 52.1666666667 84% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2101.0 1977.66487455 106% => OK
No of words: 393.0 407.700716846 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34605597964 4.8611393121 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45244063426 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81967369241 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 212.727598566 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.534351145038 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 657.9 618.680645161 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 8.0 1.86738351254 428% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.4178662662 48.9658058833 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.722222222 100.406767564 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8333333333 20.6045352989 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.45110844103 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.297569008083 0.236089414692 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10864325826 0.076458572812 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0958421936234 0.0737576698707 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187872912975 0.150856017488 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0512112237578 0.0645574589148 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 11.7677419355 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 58.1214874552 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 10.9000537634 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.01818996416 113% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 86.8835125448 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.