People hold different opinions on whether group projects can help student learn more effectively than projects done by one person. Opponents would hold the points that group projects is wasting time and thus will not help students to learn effectively. However, as for me, I agree with the statement and my reasons are as follows.
First of all, effective learning means students can learn faster, and group project can help students to learn faster. For example, when I studied Marketing mid-term with my group members, we would separate different topics to each member. I would be in charge of public relationship, and the other one would be responsible for online media section. Each of member then would sum up the important parts and shared to group members. Through this cooperation, I could memorize important marketing concepts faster and comprehend the topics efficiently, and I usually did not have to take a lot of time and got good grades in marketing exam.
In addition, learning effectively is associated with better understanding, and projects where students work together allows students have better understanding. For instance, when I had Python programming group assignments with my teammate, we usually discussed the course concept together. Sometimes I could help my member to understand the new models, and sometimes my friends would explain difficult principles for me. In the end, our group got A plus in Python course. On the other hand, when I studied the other programming course, Javascript, on my own, I could only find solutions on my own if I met some bugs or problems. In the end, I did not got good grade.
Last but not least, students can learn more effectively if they focus on study more, and doing projects with classmates can help students be more concentrated on their study. When I was in high school, I had a Biology project with the student who was ranked first in class. She was so dedicated to the Biology project that I had to end up studying hard with her all the time. Nonetheless, I found I could focus more on Biology when working with her because she always forced me to stay focus.
To conclude, I believe that students can learn much more effectively when they have group projects because they can learn faster, they can have better understanding, and they will stay focus.
- TPO-33 - Integrated Writing Task Carved stone balls are a curious type of artifact found at a number of locations in Scotland. They date from the late Neolithic period, around 4,000 years ago. They are round in shape; they were carved from several types o 75
- The best way for society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation not competition.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree wi 66
- TPO28- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Parents today are more involved in their children's education than parents were in the past.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- TOEFL T P O 30 Integrated Writing Task 91
- TPO33-When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 652, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'did' requires the base form of the verb: 'get'
Suggestion: get
...bugs or problems. In the end, I did not got good grade. Last but not least, stud...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, nonetheless, so, then, thus, as for, for example, for instance, in addition, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 9.8082437276 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 43.0788530466 102% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 52.1666666667 82% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1946.0 1977.66487455 98% => OK
No of words: 393.0 407.700716846 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95165394402 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45244063426 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72744814484 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 212.727598566 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.483460559796 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 572.4 618.680645161 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 1.86738351254 375% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.5506053614 48.9658058833 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.421052632 100.406767564 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6842105263 20.6045352989 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.45110844103 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.326153431094 0.236089414692 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100175974155 0.076458572812 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102170573522 0.0737576698707 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.206456145575 0.150856017488 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0617973319713 0.0645574589148 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 11.7677419355 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 10.9000537634 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.72 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 86.8835125448 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.