TPO41-Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Teacher were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they were nowadays.
At the turn of the new century, with the galloping rate of scientific and technological development, no one can turn a blind eye to recent debates over whether teachers were more appreciated and valued in the past than they were nowadays. Different people hold different views due to their distinct backgrounds and perspectives. Some people adhere to the point that teachers are now less valued than before while others believe that teachers are still appreciated and important to the current society. As a matter of fact, the issue of teachers standing is so complicated and controversial that it is impossible to find a universal answer to this question. Nevertheless, as far as I am concerned, I endorse that teachers are of great value in today's society.
To begin with, teachers are admittedly very important for educate children. In fact, it is inevitably that parents will let their children attend school to follow the teacher's guidance. For instance, the so-called “school district housings" refers to houses located within the admitting range of primary or secondary schools, as long as bought and settled, children are ensured to attend school within the respective regions. Many parents have shifted homes to get their children admitted to "excellent" schools, forcing housing prices in those areas to rise drastically to more than twenty thousand U.S dollars per square meter. For Chinese parents, a "key" school is the first step to the bright future of their children. And what makes a "key" school? Definitely outstanding teachers. With the guidance of those teachers, children are able to excel in their academic studies, to learn about fresh and stimulating thoughts, to appreciate fine arts as well as comprehending arts more thoroughly, to identify things that they're genuinely passionate about rather than just dabble in a hodgepodge of things.
Considering a border context, teachers contribute to the society to a great extent for the reason that they play a pivotal role in making a country's future promising - give education to the youth. And in return, the government is rewarding teachers with higher salaries than many other careers. Take professors in the U.S. as an example, the U.S. Bureau of labor Statistics reports that college professors, or postsecondary teachers, earned an average of $74,400 per year while junior college professors or instructors made $70,490 per year. According to the U.S. society, such income can definitely make a family with teachers an upper class. On the basis of the above facts, we can draw a conclusion that teachers are taking a great proportion of wealth in a country by playing a significant role in the society - educating people.
Overall, I hold the viewpoint that teachers are of great importance to children as well as the society, which has been empirically proven by the facts showed above. Although some students show disrespect to teachers, this may be modified or reversed by better education from teachers themselves or parents, and thus, generally, teachers are appreciated and valued by nowadays society.
- TPO43 85
- TPO32——Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Young people today have no influence on the important decisions that determine the future ofsociety as a whole. 70
- TPO21 80
- TPO11-Some people say that the Internet provides people with a lot of valuable information. Othersthink access to much information creates problems. Which view do you agree with? 90
- TPO14 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 140, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'debates'' or 'debate's'?
Suggestion: debates'; debate's
..., no one can turn a blind eye to recent debates over whether teachers were more appreci...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 168, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'teachers'' or 'teacher's'?
Suggestion: teachers'; teacher's
...ir children attend school to follow the teachers guidance. For instance, the so-called &...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 623, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: S
...stically to more than twenty thousand U.S dollars per square meter. For Chinese p...
^
Line 3, column 672, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... per square meter. For Chinese parents, a 'key' school is the first ste...
^
Line 3, column 770, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...uture of their children. And what makes a 'key' school? Definitely outs...
^
Line 3, column 1062, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: they're
...ore thoroughly, to identify things that theyre genuinely passionate about rather than ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, may, nevertheless, second, so, still, thus, well, while, as to, for instance, in fact, as a matter of fact, as well as, to begin with, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 43.0788530466 65% => OK
Preposition: 72.0 52.1666666667 138% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2634.0 1977.66487455 133% => OK
No of words: 496.0 407.700716846 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31048387097 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.71922212354 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02300817234 2.67179642975 113% => OK
Unique words: 275.0 212.727598566 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554435483871 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 803.7 618.680645161 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 11.0 4.94265232975 223% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 75.2768224622 48.9658058833 154% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.7 100.406767564 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8 20.6045352989 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.4 5.45110844103 154% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.227191390931 0.236089414692 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0635374763428 0.076458572812 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0731077910847 0.0737576698707 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135739672232 0.150856017488 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0850839906658 0.0645574589148 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 11.7677419355 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 58.1214874552 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 10.9000537634 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.16 8.01818996416 114% => OK
difficult_words: 136.0 86.8835125448 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.