We always face different small or big problems in our daily life. These problems make our life worse unless we solve them quickly. Everyone has their style for problem-solving. In this essay, I am going to explain how I deal with problems.
The first thing I do to tackle with a problem is analyzing the source of the problem. When I find the cause of it, I try to find a few solutions. So, I decide which one is the most suitable solution and then I apply it to solve the problem. I learned this method of problem-solving from a personal improvement book that it is always useful. Let's take my experience as an example. I was struggling with one of my class when I was at the university. How many times I tried to understand it but, I could not succeed. So, I decided to think about why I am not able to understand this subject and decided to change my approach to it. Indeed, the subject was really easy but something I exaggerated prevented me. Examining the source of the problem is one of my problems solving way.
If I do not deal with the problem, the more effective and easy way of problem-solving is asking for help from other people. There is a famous proverb meaning that if you know deep knowledge on some topic, it had better ask other people. In other words, sometimes people may not aware of their mistakes or weakness. So, getting help from someone is always better for you since if you find their help useful, then you can apply it; but, if you think that it does not work, then you can ignore it. For instance, I am a member of Toefl IBT group on the Facebook and I always upload my essay on that page in order to get a help from other members. Because my essays, which I cannot find my mistakes, may have a lot of mistakes and thanks to those members help, I improve my writing skills. What I am saying that resorting to people about your problems is always make it easier to solve.
To sum up, every people has their problem-solving ways. My ways of problem-solving are analyzing the source of the problem and asking for help from other people. These are the ways always working.
- Do you agree or disagree computer games is waste of time and children should not be allowed to play 70
- Eco certification and American wood companies (Integrated)Reading Section: In an effort to encourage ecologically sustainable forestry practices, an international organization started issuing certifications to wood companies that meet high ecological stan 97
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours. Use specific reasons and examples to suppo 70
- TPO-15 - Integrated Writing Task The cane toad is a large (1.8 kg) amphibian species native to Central and South America. It was deliberately introduced to Australia in 1935 with the expectation that it would protect farmers' crops by eating harmful insec 80
- TPO 29-Integrated writing 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 342, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
...rovement book that it is always useful. Lets take my experience as an example. I was...
^^^^
Line 5, column 858, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'made'.
Suggestion: made
...to people about your problems is always make it easier to solve. To sum up, every...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, may, really, so, then, for instance, you know, in other words, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 68.0 43.0788530466 158% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 52.1666666667 90% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1718.0 1977.66487455 87% => OK
No of words: 391.0 407.700716846 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.39386189258 4.8611393121 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44676510885 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58385191328 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 212.727598566 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.493606138107 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 538.2 618.680645161 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.3645449803 48.9658058833 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 71.5833333333 100.406767564 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2916666667 20.6045352989 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.66666666667 5.45110844103 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185025117237 0.236089414692 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0510125443939 0.076458572812 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0520328829213 0.0737576698707 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111565681915 0.150856017488 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.032093987493 0.0645574589148 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.4 11.7677419355 63% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 58.1214874552 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.1575268817 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.89 10.9000537634 72% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.81 8.01818996416 85% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 86.8835125448 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.002688172 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.