Thanks to the progress of technology, people can collaborate with each other as a team in numerous ways. Nowadays, co-workers contact others about their projects by e-mail and the internet. As far as I am concerned, I believe that sharing ideas about a project face to face could yield a better product. I feel this way for two main reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
To begin with, communicating with the internet and email could bring about misinterpretation, which influences the output of the work. Since people cannot see the face of their counterparts by email, they could not recognize their feelings. On the other hand, when colleagues have a face to face contact about their project, it is more likely to sense their feelings better about the work. The eyes and body language can transmit the purpose behind words. For instance, two years ago when I was working for an advertising company, I had to collaborate with my workmate about a project by email. At first, I could not recognize his real idea about my suggestion because he uses words that were ambiguous for me. This way gave rise to misinterpretation between us. After a while, I noticed he had not had a good idea about my suggestion. This caused falling in our project.
Secondly, face-to-face communication about a work takes a lower time than by email, which means it could raise the efficiency of the work. Sending emails and receiving the response more likely takes time. However, when you communicate in person, you can perceive your response right away. My personal experience is a compelling example of this. When I was collaborating with my classmate on a project at university ten years ago, we shared our findings with each other by email. Since receiving emails from my classmate took time, we wasted much time doing the work. If we had had face-to-face communication about the project, we could have done the assignment better and in a shorter time.
In conclusion, I am of the opinion that communication about a plan in person gives rise to more productive results than by email. This is because collaborating in the face to face way prevents misinterpretation, and produces efficient outcomes.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Movies and television have more negative effects than positive effects on the way young people behave Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 66
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Governments should spend more money in support of arts than in support of athletics such as state sponsored Olympic teams Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Governments should spend more money in support of arts than in support of athletics such as state sponsored Olympic teams Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- When classmates or colleagues communicate about a project in person instead of by e mails they will produce better work for the project 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends easily 70
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, second, secondly, so, while, for instance, i feel, in conclusion, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 15.1003584229 40% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 43.0788530466 107% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 52.1666666667 111% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1831.0 1977.66487455 93% => OK
No of words: 372.0 407.700716846 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92204301075 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39173103935 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95909382583 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 212.727598566 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.510752688172 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 580.5 618.680645161 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 9.59856630824 167% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.8575405919 48.9658058833 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.2272727273 100.406767564 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9090909091 20.6045352989 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.36363636364 5.45110844103 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.88709677419 225% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.322037255735 0.236089414692 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0881386886116 0.076458572812 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0682488240346 0.0737576698707 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189715680257 0.150856017488 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0561659942376 0.0645574589148 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 11.7677419355 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 58.1214874552 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.96 10.9000537634 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 86.8835125448 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.